Home recent Blaming Boomers is Generational Victimhood for Losers
Home recent Blaming Boomers is Generational Victimhood for Losers

Blaming Boomers is Generational Victimhood for Losers



I was in high school when I came across a copy of ‘13th Gen: Abort, Retry, Ignore, Fail’ in the principal’s office. The book with its shortened ‘generation’ title, computer reference, mixture of cartoons and factoids had been intended for teenagers, but was mostly read by the baby boomers trying to understand them. And ‘13th Gen’s message was to blame the Boomers.

‘13th Gen’ was the work of two D.C. consultants and staffers William Strauss and Neil Howe trying to popularize their, unfortunately all too popular, ‘generational theory’ to a younger generation that they presumed was stupid, shallow and incapable of grasping anything that wasn’t an MTV music video. And they did it by trying to convince Gen X they were victims.

The popular stereotype of the newest generation as lazy idiots wasn’t a new one.

“What is happening to our young people? They disrespect their elders. They disobey their parents. They ignore the laws. They riot in the streets inflamed with wild notions. Their morals are decaying. What is to become of them?” Plato wondered.

The Greatest Generation had been held in contempt by its elders who had fought in the trenches amid poisoned gas, and the veterans of Normandy then scorned the Boomers, but Gen X was the first generation to be both held in contempt and to be told it wasn’t their fault.

When I skimmed through 13th Gen, the takeaway was that my generation was doomed, the Boomers had taken all the good things in life and left nothing but crumbs and a poisoned chalice. We would inherit a bad economy and a wrecked environment and the Boomers who selfishly did this would unfairly blame us for being slackers even though we never had a chance.

13th Gen is long forgotten because Strauss and Howe made a bad bet on the branding, trying to brand my generation as the 13th after America’s Founding. A bad novel written by an author influenced by the ‘Strauss-Howe Generational Theory’ borrowed the old Generation X name that had been in use for every generation beginning with the Baby Boomers. And it stuck.

By the time I was skimming through 13th Gen, I was confused by the title because we had long since been known as Generation X and I wasn’t impressed by its premise that I was one of the downtrodden, a member of a ‘generation’ rather than myself.

Strauss and Howe did better when they named Millennials who proved less resistant to generational victimhood than Generation X had and then the awkwardly named Gen Z had come of age in a culture where victimhood had become the default setting for daily life.

Generational victimhood turned generations, beginning with mine, into minority groups, simultaneously treated as inferior and as victims, who needed to be condescended to and life had to be made easy for, because we weren’t good enough and it wasn’t our fault.

Gen X and then every generation after us were the new ‘blacks’, told that there was no use in trying because the game had been rigged against us, that we should stop working hard and start radicalizing against our generational oppressors.

Academics trying to dismantle the system claimed that Gen X had to be talked down to and so replaced English Literature with the lyrics of Kurt Cobain, then Buffy episodes for Millennials and SpongeBob for Gen Z. (The cartoon character shows up alongside Karl Marx and Kafka’s Metamorphosis in a comparative literature class at Emory University about the evils of work.)

Radicalizing Gen X paid dividends with the WTO riots in Seattle that foreshadowed Occupy Wall Street and introduced Antifa violence in major cities. Organizers billed it as the voice of a disaffected generation. The violence marked the official passing of the radical torch across generations. “WTO Protest: The apathy generation finally has a reason to be angry,” a relieved Independent article proclaimed.

Every new generation was inducted into the culture of anger and taught that all their problems were the fault of the Boomers and the generations that had come before them. The same core message of 13th Gen was distilled to each generation. Every generation was different, more disaffected, more lacking and more in need of being condescended to. Older generations had to learn how to talk to and make allowances for Gen X, then Millennials and then Gen Z. Worse work habits and ethics weren’t immaturity due to low expectations, but signs of ‘authenticity’.

The new generations were the new ‘noble savages’, true to themselves and therefore less prone to adapting to capitalism and polite society. Their truths would help redefine us.

A decade after the Strauss-Howe worldview was popularized, everyone took it for granted that we were defined by generations, not by our individual selves. This brand of socio-political astrology convinced hundreds of millions of people to measure themselves and others by the generational equivalent of Scorpio and Libra that were just as real and just as valid.

Identity politics works because people love to group themselves into artificial categories, granfalloons, that appear to explain their identity in relation to a large whole. Generational identity is a false construct based on dubious theories about society. Even though people assert that they’re one generation or another, no one even agrees what years serve as the boundaries for the artificial generations beginning with Generation X.

And the real purpose of the generational divides isn’t a meaningful identity, but radicalism. What used to be slacker Marxism has been adopted by apologists for groypers and other woke right movements who claim that the likes of Fuentes are victims of the Boomers.

Fast forward to the present and generational victimhood, contempt for previous generations and calls to “listen to the youth” aren’t just a staple of leftist politics, but of the woke right. The litany of complaints sound familiar. The newest generation is oppressed. They can’t get jobs or get married because the system has been rigged against them. All they can do is attack the system.

Generational identity politics is the Marxism of losers. And that loser credo is what the “OK Boomer” taunt really comes down to. They invent a world in which every generation before them, especially the Boomers, had it easy while all they can do is start podcasts with $5,000 worth of studio equipment to complain about how everything and everyone is keeping them down.

Life in America has been going downhill, not because of just one single generation, but every generation which made the new low into the new normal, and yet it’s also to the credit of every generation that it kept the country going throughout all the cultural and economic decay.

If the majority of the population of any period really were more bad than good, the United States of America would look like Haiti. No generation has a monopoly on sins or virtues. Behind the stereotypes of each generation and its worst representatives is the concrete reality that when its time came, each generation provided the heroes and the everyday people who make life possible. As Americans, what we truly have in common, beyond the surface detritus of pop culture, fashion and memories of world events, are the values that extend across time.

Those who try to tell you otherwise, whether they claim to be on the left or the right, are the envious and the ungrateful, the corrupt and the false, who want to tear America down. They’re not the victims of anyone except their own sins and refusal to reckon with their natures. We should feel sorry for them, not because they’re oppressed, but because they’re losers.

And losers will always cluster into a group, blame someone else and demand to be in charge.





Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine.

Thank you for reading. 



Read my book 'Domestic Enemies: The Founding Fathers' Fight Against the Left' to discover the true origins of the American Left.

Comments

  1. I've seen plenty of stories blaming us boomers for the housing affordability "crisis." We wicked oldsters are not selling our family-sized homes and moving into someplace suitable for just couples, making those family-sized homes less available for younger people with growing families.

    But what are we really doing? Selling the family-sized home means that we still have to have someplace to live, and that costs money. Rather than staying in homes on which we might owe nothing, the young whippersnappers want us to have to pay for a place to live, whether it is a smaller home we buy or someplace we rent. In theory, we might buy something with the proceeds from selling the family-sized home, perhaps for less than we cleared in the sale.

    But that comes with its own problems. We might be able to buy it for less than we sold the previous home, but property taxes normally get reassessed when a home is bought, so we might wind up paying much more on a house assessed in 2025 than on the family home on which a lower value was assessed when it was bought, and perhaps not reassessed to keep up with Bidenflation. And moving isn't necessarily cheap, nor easy for someone in his seventies.

    That, however, isn't our real concern, at least not for us. Eventually we'll go to our eternal rewards, and our children will inherit our property. Whether they choose to move back to the family home or not, they benefit, either from a home which is already paid off, or from selling it at a higher price than a smaller, couples-only house.

    I grew up poor, and was 63 years old the first time I was able to take a vacation outside of the United States. Our kids are in their thirties, both have professional jobs, and have already been to Italy, Spain, France, Scotland, and Greece, not even including deployments thanks to the United States Army. We've done what we could to provide better lives for our daughters than we had ourselves, at it seems to have worked. One daughter is a homeowner herself, in part because she saw, first-hand, how buying a home improves people's personal finances. And rather than cash, which can rise and fall, they'll have well over $250,000 in real estate wealth they can split among themselves, real estate that did not cost us nearly that much.

    So maybe the whiners want to blame boomers, but for what they are blaming us is being smart.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

You May Also Like