Home What's Really Behind the Impeachment Con?
Home What's Really Behind the Impeachment Con?

What's Really Behind the Impeachment Con?

The Democrats have become a cult of anti-personality.

The ‘anti’ phenomenon is not unique. Past Democrat generations had built their identity around hating Goldwater, Nixon, and Reagan. But the internet monetized the cult of anti-personality in a big way.

And Democrats are paying the price.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Dem House leadership have tried everything possible to stop the talk of impeachment. But nothing that she and her deputies can do has made a dent in the madness.

In a sign of pure desperation, Pelosi has begun insisting that impeachment is a Trump conspiracy.

“Trump is goading us to impeach him," she actually claimed.

The Dem House leader is hoping to dissuade her faction from its self-destructive orgy of Trump hatred by tapping into that hatred to convince them that impeaching Trump is exactly what he wants.

And it won’t work.

Impeaching Trump is the obsession of a narrow slice of the Dem base. But it’s the one that provides much of the money and the manpower. The Democrats wouldn’t have won in 2018 without the Trump-haters, but they won’t be able to win in 2020 with them. Their fanaticism proved crucial in midterm elections where Democrats traditionally suffered from low voter turnout. But in a presidential election, voter turnout will be high. And the Democrats will need to win over independent voters.

A majority of Americans opposes impeachment. But impeachment fever turned otherwise obscure Dem politicians like Rep. Maxine Waters, Red. Ted Lieu and Rep. Adam Schiff into resistance celebrities.

While Pelosi worries about losing moderate districts, the loudest impeachment activists can’t lose.

Most of the House impeachment noise has been coming from Congressional Black Caucus, California and New York House members who are safely ensconced in districts that Republicans can’t win. The more noise they make, the more they can fundraise, build their brand and get invited on MSNBC.

They don’t risk losing their seats through a challenge from the right, but from the left.

Joe Crowley’s defeat at the hands of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez was a warning. Alienating Democrats or infuriating Republicans poses no risk to Democrats in safe districts. They’re worried about another prog coming out of the woodwork and impeachment is their shield against a challenger.

While Pelosi wants to hold on to her speakership by getting and keeping House Dems in swing states, the impeachment caucus is only out for the interests of its members. Before internet fundraising, political grandstanding wasn’t nearly as profitable. But Trump and the internet have changed all that.

Rep. Adam Schiff’s fundraising take went from below a million in 2016 to $6.25 million in 2018. Rep. Eric Swalwell’s finances ballooned from $1.9 million in 2016 to over $3 million in 2018. Swalwell became so confident that he even decided to run for president. Rep. Sheila Lee Jackson had her best fundraising totals since the Bush era. Rep. Maxine Waters went from raising $729,000 in 2012 to $1.59 million.

With numbers like these, why stop?

Talking about impeaching Trump provides the old Democrats in safe districts with a cash flow and protection against usurpers backed by the Democratic Socialists of America. Even if it hurts their party.

The House impeachment activism also reflects the split within the Democrat electorate.

At April's end, an NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll showed that42% of adults wanted an end to the investigation. Another 33% wanted more congressional hearings.

Only 16% were ready for impeachment.

Among Democrats, only 27% were ready for impeachment. Impeachment fever was highest among "progressives". 30% of Democrat women wanted impeachment, but only 23% of men.Support for impeaching Trump was highest in the big cities that are home to the resistance and lowest in rural areas.

(Contrary to Pelosi's exercise in reverse psychology, only 1% of Trump supporters wanted Democrats to start impeachmentproceedings.)

Support for impeachment was highest in the West.

If you want to understand why California politicians like Rep. Maxine Waters, Rep. Ted Lieu and Rep. Adam Schiff are all over the news networks talking impeachment, these numbers show why.

In the 2018 exit polls, support for impeachment was highest in California followed by New York. That’s also where much of the money that swung the midterm elections came from. California donors bought elections and special elections for Democrats in red and purple states in impeachment’s name.

But the rest of the country isn’t California or New York.

Impeachment was a con. Democrats solicited fortunes from bicoastal donors while promising them something that they knew they couldn’t and wouldn’t deliver. It’s a familiar con in politics. There’s just one problem. Pelosi, Schumer and the Dem leadership need the donors they’ve conned to keep giving.

The Democrats have been caught on the hook of their own con.

Their money is telling them one thing while their electorate is telling them another. The media desperately needs an impeachment push to goose their ratings. Impeachment is the only thing that would lift CNN’s ratings out of the toilet. And if the Democrats won’t give the media what it wants, the same outlets that profited from the Mueller witch hunt will go after Pelosi for standing in their way.

The Democrats can have the money and the media, or win elections. But they can’t have all three.

That’s why Speaker Pelosi is finding new convoluted reasons to avoid an impeachment push. The crazy lies are an effort to string along donors and media outlets until the election, without alienating the independent voters that her faction needs to win, in order to defeat Trump and the Republicans.

And that will take the impeachment question off the table and validate her strategy.

But if Trump is reelected, then Pelosi will fall. The Democrats are playing it safe by backing Biden and avoiding impeachment. But if Biden becomes the nominee and loses, lefties will claim that the election was lost because the Democrat leadership chose to play it safe instead of going radical.

Trump’s reelection will crack open the con and wipe out a faded generation of Democrat leadership.

That’s why Pelosi has made this her final rodeo. If her bet pays off, she retires after taking a victory lap. If it fails, she leaves in disgrace to sip chardonnay with Hillary Clinton and blame the Russians.

But even making it to 2020 will require keeping the lid on a furious donor class and unruly House.

Speaker Pelosi has failed to control either the freshman radicals like Rep. Ocasio Cortez and Rep. Tlaib or the rest of her California delegation which won’t stop playing the impeachment card.

The Mueller report took more pressure off Pelosi than it did Trump. In its aftermath, she’s trying to channel Dem activity into endless hearings, which are always a safe bet in Washington D.C., and into going after Trump officials whose persecution won’t alienate independents or rile up Republicans.

But it won’t be enough.

The Democrats have become a party of hate. The haters have poured money and manpower into a moribund party. It’s their party now and they will settle for nothing less than destroying Trump.

Even if it destroys them too.

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article originally appeared at Front Page Magazine.

Click here to subscribe to my articles. And thank you for reading.


  1. Excellent writing

  2. The Conservative Curmudgeon21/5/19

    Come on Daniel lets not play games here. Why don't you ask "What is behind the WALL con?" or "What is behind the repeal Obamacare con?". Both political parties realize they have no chance of passing these ideas but the parties use these trigger topics to get the gullible and irate out to vote year after year after year.

    Why should ANYONE with an once of common sense believe a four page summery exonerating the president when that person was appointed by the president? Not only that but it was written by someone who wrote a 19 page audition for the Attorney General job saying the president can not be indicted. That's about as believable as asking us to believe Janet Reno writing a four page summery of the Starr report exonerating Clinton. But when you value fealty over facts and you are targeting people the president said "I love the uneducated" I suppose they'll eat anything you say up.

  3. Anonymous21/5/19

    Our country is being invaded at the southern border and all media can talk about is investigating Trump. The investigations, accusations, and divisions it causes equals 'see, there's a squirrel'. And the money is the key. As always. Somebody knows how to play our politicians like a Stradivarius. My opinion. Could be mad cow disease, I suppose.

  4. the democrat party is the scorpion in the scorpion and the swan fairy tale.

  5. Why, why, why??? Why do they do what they do, and what's their real motivation?

    The answer does not reside in politics. This is not a political struggle... those are only about power. This is a religious struggle... the issue is about morality. Leftism is a secular religious cult. We are in an existential war with Equality, the holy fantasy that is worshiped at the core of the leftist religion. It's going to take another religion to fight a religion. It comes down to one type of value system versus another type of value system, one kind of morality against another kind of morality. There is no room for compromise between warring religions when leftists have vowed to destroy all others, especially traditional Christianity. Everything rabid leftists do to prosecute this war, no matter how devoid of consistency, legality, truth, reason, or factual reality, they do because they believe they are morally entitled. Leftists are eager to sacrifice you, your family, and your nation on the bloody altar of their holy narratives. And they repeatedly prove that their religion is stronger than that of Judeo-Christ, a fictitious entity created out of whole cloth to usurp Jesus Christ.

    “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.” ...some old Chinaman named Sun Tzu

    Regarding the damned left, someone better explain something correctly to somebody. If we don't understand the true nature of that vile enemy, then we'll never be able to defeat her.


Post a Comment

You May Also Like