Home America Doesn't Have an Anti-Semitism Problem. American Politics Does
Home America Doesn't Have an Anti-Semitism Problem. American Politics Does

America Doesn't Have an Anti-Semitism Problem. American Politics Does

If anti-Semitism is thriving among Americans, there’s no sign of it in any of the latest polls. Americans are the least anti-Semitic people in the world. A 2017 poll, taken at the height of a spike in anti-Semitism, showed that 14% of Americans held anti-Semitic attitudes. That was up from 10% in 2015 and 12% in 2013. That’s not a great trend, but it also shows just how narrow the scope of the problem is.

It’s also dramatically different than the numbers from similar polls conducted in Europe.

How then can we explain the rise in anti-Semitic violence? What about the increased harassment of Jews on campuses and in major cities? And why is there a rise in anti-Semitic discourse?

There’s no climate of hatred in America. The rising anti-Semitic rhetoric and violence are the work of small but highly active political groups who have become disproportionately influential in public life.

The rise in anti-Semitism isn’t happening among ordinary Americans, but among a narrow group of influencers. An anti-Semitic cartoon in the New York Times isn’t representative of the country. Neither is Rep. Ilhan Omar. Nor are Richard Spencer or the alt-righters who tweet their own anti-Semitic memes.

Anti-Semitic violence is rising. But the total number of incidents remains small. The perpetrators represent a small segment of the population. The violent doesn’t come from ‘anywhere’. On campuses and in synagogues, it comes from a small radical population of the alt-left and the alt-right. In urban areas, it originates with a slightly larger, but still fairly small population, of neighborhood bigots.

Anti-Semitism is marginal among Americans, but it’s increasingly mainstream in political activism.

Anti-Semitic incidents on campuses have doubled for several years in a row. Growing numbers of Jewish students report feeling intimidated and threatened. But the intimidation is the work of a small minority motivated by political ideology. The number of students engaging in campus harassment through hate groups such as Students for Justice in Palestine remains tiny. The real problem is the complicity of identity politics groups in supporting campus hate groups and administrators in turning a blind eye to it.

The harassment is most intense at a handful of top, but not truly elite schools, in a few states. The situation is not representative of the country or even its average campus. Even in the most problematic schools, only a small politically active minority plays any role in the harassment. But that minority dominates campuses and the campuses provide much of the future leadership of the country.

It’s the same problem nationwide.

Americans don’t have an anti-Semitism problem. American politics has an anti-Semitism problem because, just like on college campuses, small groups are driving an anti-Semitic agenda.

American politics isn’t anti-Semitic. But its leadership is becoming complicit in anti-Semitism.

Anti-Semitism is a function of political radicalism. And very few Americans are political radicals. But the radicals are driving national politics by constantly shattering political norms and normalizing extremism. Hatred of Jews is just one of the radical ideas heading from the political margins into the mainstream. The mainstream of politics though is a very different thing than the mainstream of American values.

Polls show that most Americans still view anti-Semitism as disgusting. But that’s no longer the case among political activists and elites as anti-Semitism becomes embedded within political movements.

The anti-Semitic cartoon in the New York Times was not a sign that anti-Semitism had become normalized among Americans, but it had become so normalized in the media that it did not notice when its language of covert anti-Semitism slurred and crossed the red line into overt anti-Semitism.

America’s anti-Semitism problem is worst, not in small rural towns, but in urban media operations.

National politics was radicalized by media operations that took the marginal agendas of fringe groups and mainstreamed them. Anti-Semitism is just another one of those many radical agendas.

The media mainstreamed and normalized radicals like Tamika Mallory and Linda Sarsour while glossing over their hateful agendas. It celebrates and defends Rep. Omar’s bigotry. Rep. Omar is one of hundreds of members of the House. She’s a freshman with no notable accomplishments. The only reason that everyone in the country knows her name is because the media chose to turn her into a celebrity.

Rep. Omar’s displays of anti-Semitism aren’t surprising. The same ADL poll that found that only 14% of Americans held anti-Semitic beliefs, also found that 34% of Muslims in Americans held those beliefs.

Muslims make up around 1% of the country.

How did a woman who represents 34% of 1% of the country suddenly become the face of a political movement that claims to represent half the country?

And why did Democrats rally behind a bigot who represents a third of a percent of the country?

Most Democrats are not anti-Semitic. Even most of the radicals backing Rep. Omar are not explicitly anti-Semitic. But they’re willing to defend anti-Semitism as part of an alliance with that hateful third.

That’s also how the anti-Semitic cartoon showed up in the New York Times.

American politics isn’t anti-Semitic. But it’s full of politically active people who will defend anti-Semites against charges of anti-Semitism because they agree with them on the rest of their political agenda.

Anti-Semitism in American politics is a symptom of this mainstreaming of political radicals.

The media may not be trying to intentionally mainstream anti-Semitism. As in Omar’s case, it’s collateral damage from mainstreaming radicals. The New York Times editorial staff didn’t wake up one morning and decide on the best way to mainstream anti-Semitism by printing a cartoon of Trump in Jewish religious garb. The anti-Semitic cartoon was collateral damage from mainstreaming radicals like Rep. Omar and Linda Sarsour who blurred the line between hatred of Israel and hatred of Jews.

Once the media mainstreamed anti-Semitic radicals, it defended them against charges of anti-Semitism.

Anti-Semitism may not be growing, but tolerance for it is. And that can be just as dangerous. The things that you justify, whitewash and minimize, can become the things that you eventually get on board with.

Racial supremacism and obsessive hatred of Israel are radical views shared by few Americans. But they are the feverish obsessions of small, determined groups of activists who are defining national politics. As their activists gain traction, anti-Semitism leaks from the fringes and into movement organizations.

Radicals make up an even tinier percentage of the country than the campus. But anyone who reads, listens to and watches the media would think that a minority of radicals have become the majority.

This isn’t the Corbynization, but the ‘Campusization’ of American politics.

American politics have come to resemble the college campus with a small group of radicals calling the shot and a media that hardly anyone pays attention to defending them, while the majority doesn’t care.

Campus radicals are no longer just allotting student funds. They’re trying to run the country.

The lessons of the battle against anti-Semitism on campuses will need to be applied to national politics. Jewish groups failed to fight the problem on college campuses. The graduates from many of these institutions went on to bigger and better things. And now the problem has gone nationwide.

Anti-Semitism isn’t an American problem. It’s a radical problem.

The Campusization’ of American politics is the challenge of fighting to prevent a tiny minority of extremists from doing to the country what they have already done to the college campus.

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article originally appeared at Front Page Magazine.

Click here to subscribe to my articles. And thank you for reading.


  1. ===================================

    The Universities Have Abandoned the Jews.
    Should Jews Abandon the Universities


    Is there room in the academy for honest scholarship on Israel?


  2. Journalism’s Longest War: The New York Times
    versus Zionism and Israel
    by Edward Alexander:


  3. ===================================

    Jeremy Rosen said:

    “We were fooling ourselves if we thought that
    anti-Semitism had disappeared.

    And if the left wing of the Democratic Party
    achieves dominance, you can be sure it will increase.”

    SOURCE: The One Easy Answer: Blame the Jews
    by Jeremy Rosen, 2018/11/27

    Why no consequences for anti-Semitism in Democratic Party?

    Democratic Party Fails to Condemn Anti-Semitic Democrats: www.algemeiner.com/2019/03/25/the-democratic-party-fails-to-condemn-antisemitic-democrats/

    Another Anti-Semite in the Democratic Party:

    The Democratic Party’s New Apologists for Anti-Semitism:

    Are young Jewish voters ready to say enough with the Democrats?

    Why Are Democrats Kissing The Ring Of Al Sharpton?

    The Party of Bias and Bigotry
    by Yaakov Menken 2019 April 25


    Jewish leaders decry lack of censure
    by most Democratic candidates on Gaza rocket fire


  4. AliciaM23/5/19

    A good summary of the current status of anti-Semtism in the United States. I think Jews are particularly vulnerable now due to the frightening decline of valuing human life and increased toleration of public tantrums and attacks. (See Portland, Oregon)

    The nation has seen abortion goals of the pro-choice movement go from “safe, legal and rare” to activists bragging about past abortions as something good plus legalizing infanticide in two states so far. And that's if you do not count late-term abortions where those are legal. There has been a conditioning process that has moved the Overton window and after that the laws.

    Babies were the first step in numbing the public to what are currently considered atrocities by almost all of the public. Or perhaps the second step – We know from President Obama's statements that mainstream Democrats are OK with letting ill elderly people die rather than treating them.

    Radical leftists routinely call for killing conservatives now. How often do you hear a Democrat politician condemn that?

    I don't know what to advocate as a solution, but cleaning out the universities and cleaning up K-12 would be a good start.

    And we had better start soon, or we'll see in the US what routinely happens to Jews in France, for example. If not, we could well see a replay of 1930's and 1940s Germany. We cannot let the majority be ruled by a crazed fringe group.

  5. As early as 1965, when I was talking to 2 progressive young women, and I mentioned that their desires would lead to making all society like a college campus, their reply was ..."That's an excellent idea!" They ignored the vicious politics of academia, even on its better days. The politicization of all Civil Society is their goal.

    They were denying then, as much as other progressives do today, the point made by Toynbee:

    “When a society moves from allocating resources by custom and tradition (moderns read here, by politics) to allocating resources by markets, they may be said to have undergone an industrial revolution” Arnold Toynbee-1884

    The data from the 75-years long experiment that Stalin named, "the socialist camp" runs off today's progressives like water off a duck's back. Ever since Israel broke the prestige of "Arab Socialism" in 1967, and junked a socialist camp takeover of the Arabian Peninsula through destroying Nasser's Army in Sinai, so that the 1/3rd of Nasser's Army then in Yemen had to be returned to defend the west bank of the Suez Canal, the socialist hatred of Israel has grown. As Israel proceeds to slowly leave socialism behind, it has intensified even more.

    Academia being the major font of socialism in the US, is naturally involved in this change. The result is that they are open to every Jew-hating trope that their Oil Money donors are willing to push. We should not be surprised.

    As long as the current self-serving academia is in place, this Jew-hatred among the academically certified political class will grow.


Post a Comment

You May Also Like