Home Muslim Immigration is What ISIS Wants
Home Muslim Immigration is What ISIS Wants

Muslim Immigration is What ISIS Wants

To understand ISIS, you have to understand the difference between terrorists and Islamic terrorists.

Ordinary terrorists have two goals; to compel the enemy to meet their political demands and to rally their supporters to consolidate their class, race or national identity group behind them.

Islamic terrorists are not interested in the “political demands” part. They will occasionally accept concessions and even offer Hudnas, temporary truces, but no permanent separate peace can be achieved with them. It’s why Israel’s peace process with terrorists has gone on failing for decades. It’s why the attempt by Gaddafi to achieve peace with the LIFG ended in a civil war and his death. It’s why Obama’s attempts to negotiate with the “moderate Taliban” failed miserably.

Al Qaeda and ISIS are not “negative” protest movements formed in response to our foreign policy. That’s a foolish self-centered idea held by foolish self-centered Westerners. Al Qaeda and ISIS are “positive” movements that seek to achieve larger religious goals entirely apart from us. Islamic terrorists are not responding to us. They are responding to the Koran and to over a thousand years of history.

Osama bin Laden did not carry out 9/11 to inflict harm on Americans. That was a secondary goal. His primary goal was to rally Muslims to build a Caliphate by encouraging them to attack America.

The ritualistic “Why do they hate us” browbeating favored by the chattering classes is nonsense. Al Qaeda hated us because we were not Muslims. But it was only using us as the hated “other” to consolidate a collective Muslim identity. We are to Islamists what the Jews were to Hitler; a useful scapegoat whose otherness can be used to manufacture a contrasting pure Aryan or Islamic identity.

No dialogue is possible with an ideology whose virtue is premised on seeing you as utterly evil.

You can negotiate with terrorists, though you shouldn’t. But Islamic terrorists rarely even bother to negotiate. Their core focus is on rallying local Muslims and the Ummah behind them. They don’t recognize national borders so any hope for a permanent peace behind recognized borders is wishful thinking. Islam is a transnational movement. Islamic terrorism is a race between terror groups around the world to carve out their own Islamic states and then use them as a springboard to a Caliphate.

ISIS is the end stage of Islamic terrorism. Its leader is a Caliph with all Muslims obliged to submit to him. The Islamic State is not just in Syria and Iraq. It is everywhere that a Muslim outpost swears allegiance to the Caliph. On its own maps the Islamic State encompasses parts of Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia and Russia. The more local Islamic terror groups pledge allegiance to ISIS, the bigger it becomes.

ISIS doesn’t plan to defeat America through acts of terrorism. The plan for defeating America, like every other country, Muslim or non-Muslim, is to build a domestic Muslim terror movement that will be able to hold territory and swear allegiance to the Islamic State.

The idea of an American Emirate may seem silly but consider Molenbeek, the neighborhood in Brussels known as the Jihadi capital of Europe, deemed a no-go zone by local authorities, right in the capital of the European Union.  You can take a taxi from NATO HQ to a Muslim micro-state linked to most of the major recent Islamic terror attacks in Europe including the latest ISIS attack in Paris.

Molenbeek provides ISIS recruits for its war and a gateway for ISIS attacks in Europe. The media is filled with articles about what ISIS wants, but there is no question that Molenbeek is what ISIS wants.

And it’s only Muslim immigration to Europe that makes an ISIS base like Molenbeek possible.

ISIS has short term and long term needs. In the short term, ISIS needs as many recruits as possible. And it is in the West where traditional Muslim ties of kinship and community are so frayed that the transnationalism of heading out to fight for a Caliphate in someone else’s country is most deeply appealing. ISIS aggressively seeks to recruit Muslims in the West because they have the skills, money and naiveté to be useful to the Islamic State. But in the long term, ISIS needs more Muslim immigration to the West to create a steady supply of recruits, collaborators and eventually Western emirates.

If ISIS is serious about making a bid for Italy, it needs a large Muslim population on the ground. It doesn’t even matter if this population comes from refugees fleeing ISIS. The children of these refugees will still be Sunni Muslims in a foreign land where Algerian, Somali, Syrian and Pakistani Muslims discover that they have more in common than they do with the natives. It is this accidental Western multiculturalism that erases tribal Muslim rivalries and makes the ambition of a single Muslim Caliphate appear plausible.

ISIS does not plan to defeat America with terror plots. But those plots will eventually accumulate into an organized domestic terror organization. An Islamic State in America based around a majority Muslim town or neighborhood with its own leader pledging allegiance to the Caliph of the Islamic State.

An American Molenbeek; and there are already plenty of candidates for that horrifying honor.

Any Muslim plans for expanding into the West depend on Muslim immigration. Whether it’s ISIS or its Muslim Brotherhood ancestor, or any of the other Islamist organizations and networks, they all require manpower. Some of that manpower will be provided by high Muslim birth rates, but it won’t be nearly enough, not for a country the size of America, without a large annual flow of Muslim migrants.

We are told that halting Muslim immigration would only encourage Muslim terrorism. But our open door to Muslim immigration certainly hasn’t stopped terrorism. Instead it has increased it by providing reinforcements to the terrorists. If we can’t stop Muslim terrorism with the population we have now, how are we going to manage it if the Islamic population continues doubling and even tripling?

Even if we defeat ISIS tomorrow, Al Qaeda and other Islamist groups descended from the Muslim Brotherhood will continue pursuing the same goals. And they will rely on the Muslim population in the United States to provide them with money, supplies, cover and an infrastructure for terrorism.

ISIS can’t defeat us with terror attacks. The only hope for an enduring Islamic victory over America is through the rise of domestic groups that pledge allegiance to the Caliphate. ISIS can’t invade America. It has to be invited in. That’s what our immigration policy does.

Trump isn’t a threat to national security. Muslim immigration is.

Islamic terrorists can’t defeat us no matter how many planes they fly into buildings. But they can and will defeat us if they continue landing planes at JFK and disembarking thousands and tens of thousands of settlers who will serve as a base population for their war against America.

Muslim immigration is the Islamic State’s only hope for victory over America.


  1. Anonymous28/12/15

    Islam is evil

  2. MartinGale28/12/15

    And yet all we hear from the political and media elites is that we must expand Muslim immigration and be especially nice to those Muslims already here, because otherwise they won't help us foil domestic terrorist plots that wouldn't exist if we hadn't admitted Muslims to our society in the first place. To be governed by people for whom this ridiculous proposition makes perfect sense is much more frightening than Trump and helps explain his persistent polling strength.

  3. Been saying this for decades

  4. Anonymous28/12/15

    With corrections...

    We constantly hear Hillary Clinton claim that she knows what ISIS wants - and that usually includes the kind of rhetoric that comes out of the mouth of Trump. In reality, however, what the Islamic State wants and has thrived on when it was gifted to IS from Obama and Clinton vis Libya, are arms and the billions of dollars of military material that the USA always leaves behind in foreign Islamic countries as they high-tail it out of these terrorist zones. Supplying and re-supplying these sub-humans as the generals make false distinctions between good combatants and the terrorists, leads to terror armies being equipped with the latest and best weaponry. No side should be equipped in the future, especially the Iraqi army who care not about the billions they leave on the ground for their terrorist brethren because they know that the USA will give them more and better just for the asking. As for the media and the democrats (and many Republicans) they have to stop seeing this war as one against a few people who are twisting their religion for their own purposes when, in fact, Muslims are following their religion in greater numbers and the immigrants are proving that they will use their religious commands to introduce Hijrah, or jihad by emigration. Obama, Clinton and especially the new Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, want to Islamize North America for their own personal and leftist reasons that the public must ask them to justify and prevent the ignorance and dangerous beliefs from spreading worldwide.

  5. I suggest that no word of Islamic doctrine (Hijrah, Caliphate, Ummah, Hudnas, et cetera) EVER be transcribed into an English-speaking article. Their dog-language deserves no publicity. Just says what the word means in English but leave the dog-talk out of it. Seeing their miserable language in print only encourages them.

  6. Think of HUD and the tens of thousands of small, potential jihad bases (apartment complexes, affordable housing, etc.) it has created in the name of equal housing over the past 40+ years.


  7. Agreeing with everything said by Mr. Greenfield concerning ISIS's tactics and overall strategy, a crucial question is: Because Obama wants to bring in tens of thousands of Muslim "refugees," and knows damned well there will be scores of ISIS agents among them, is this what he wants? Is he acting as an agent for ISIS? Is Hillary Clinton with her promise to the OIC to do what she can to suppress freedom of speech about Islam? I can posit an answer, but these are questions which naturally occur to anyone observing Obama's actions and statements.

  8. Anonymous28/12/15

    Well you almost got it right.
    Muslim immigration is what the ruling, WHITE liberal elites want ??
    Because the liberal elites believe what George Soros believes; world government and the dissolution of nation states.
    And what better way to do that than by destroying, from within, a nation .
    Very simple.

  9. I respectfully suggest that no word of Islamic doctrine ever be printed in English. Giving the English translation of the Islamic word is sufficient. For instance, don't dignify the deceptive temporary Islamic truce by naming its name (h-u-d-n-a). Instead report that Muslims deceive their enemies in truce they never mean to honor. Printing names of duplicitous Islamic tactics gives unwarranted honor to Islam.

  10. Anonymous28/12/15

    Everything you say is so true, no Muslim immigration. Yet, Obama is pushing for even more Muslims to come to the U.S., and Justin Trudeau is doing the same in Canada. Why? There are adequate refugee camps in the Middle East to accommodate refugees and those posing as refugees, and if the U. N., the U.S. and others would be serious about eliminating radical Islam we would not have a refugee problem.

    What we need now is a real leader with sensible solutions, and I would not rule out Trump or Cruz or for that matter, both on one ticket. As for Trudeau, with a large Muslim population already living in Canada, he’ll probably be around for a while.

  11. Anonymous28/12/15

    I am - for the first time that I know of - not in agreement with DG. They have been destroying us via a taxation on life, and quite effectively. Agonizing new regs, shoes off / scanners / feel-ups, snoops everywhere, and, worst of all, a certain acceptance of this and ever-expanding reaches.

    A rational culture would not tolerate all of this, so maybe if not for Islamic Terror, it'd be some other vehicle. - djr

  12. Anonymous29/12/15

    Studying BHO's personal background and his association with his mentor and pastor Jeremiah Write, (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremiah_Wright_controversy) it would be logical to think that the former is bent on destroying America from within as vengence/revenge for America's past transgresions, especially slavery. DO NOT underestimate his resolve!!!

  13. Londonbach, I think it is vital that people are familiar with the Islamic concepts. If not they will be applied by Muslims without the knowledge of others. A major advantage that Islam has is that it is a later religion/system, which was formulated with knowledge of existing systems and beliefs to deal with those beliefs. A major disadvantage that Europe and America has (in its dealings with Islam) is the opposite, that it's religions/systems originate from a pre Islam time.
    The West is driving along with Islam in its blind spot.

  14. Londonbach, I think it is vital that people are familiar with the Islamic concepts. If not they will be applied by Muslims without the knowledge of others. A major advantage that Islam has is that it is a later religion/system, which was formulated with knowledge of existing systems and beliefs to deal with those beliefs. A major disadvantage that Europe and America has (in its dealings with Islam) is the opposite, that it's religions/systems originate from a pre Islam time.
    The West is driving along with Islam in its blind spot.

  15. Keep on fighting the good fight. I have been saying this sort of thing for years. I see no solution because the only way to end it is to kill them all and start over. We are too moral to do that, given the West's Judeo-Christian underpinnings, and they will just keep throwing bodies at us, and causing chaos, and bleeding our economy until we are overwhelmed. It is happening in Europe before our eyes. Please pull out a map, take a look, at where Syria is and tell me something:
    1. If the refugees are truly fleeing the bombing and war in Syria, why wasn't escaping into a Turkey enough? Why not stay in Greece, I hear it's lovely. Armenia is close by and Azerbaijan looks pretty convenient, as does Georgia or even Russia. Jordan's pretty close and convenient, and I'm sure that they could probably have made it easily to Saudi Arabia from there. They do after all, share similar values with the cultures in these areas.
    2. Why were none of the eastern European countries good enough for them? As refugees, are they also being picky and fussy? Beggars can't be choosers but Bulgaria, which is good enough for Bulgarians, is not good enough for them? Same for Serbia. What about Romania? Why are none of these countries good enough? Why do they keep moving, why do they insist on going places like France, Germany, Sweden and the US? I submit it is because they are seeking out the places with the most to hand out for free. Because they know that they can put a drain on the economy, by sucking up sympathy handouts/welfare, etc... They can begin to slowly insert their culture into ours, and ultimately take it over. I once described Sharia creep as much like a bacteriophage. It takes over the nucleus of a bacterium and inserts it's own DNA. The bacteria then starts replicating it and spewing carbon copies of the virus and gets killed along the way. That is the goal. They are not interested in merely escaping a war torn area, so all the comparisons to WWII refugees is moot. This is an invasion.The sooner people realize this, the better chance we have of beating it back. Unfortunately the media play up the sympathetic characters and completely ignore the elephant in the room.

    They are, and will continue to use our open, free society, to destroy us from within. We declare war on "terrorism" because we refuse to name it what it really is. Terrorism is a technique, not a group noun, not a nationality. Giving all these little factions names makes it seem as though there are certain, specific groups of people that hate us. ISIS, Al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Shabib, the Taliban... How they originated or evolved does not matter. Was a particular terrorist home grown, radicalized or did they come from Syria, Saudi, or or Morocco? Does not matter. It is all different sides of the same dodecahedron that is The Caliphate. They all have one thing in mind and that is the destruction of Western culture and the creation of an Islamic State governing under Sharia Law world wide. Concern about different middle eastern countries is also misleading because these people don't recognize those borders, or any sovereignty other than Islam's. What we really have is not truly "ISIS", but IS. Period. That's who the enemy is. We have no idea how to fight an enemy like this. There are no borders, no lines, no clear enemy, and yet we think dropping a few bombs, killing a few leaders makes a dent. I say, it's almost the opposite. It may makes us feel like we have done something for a little while but it accomplishes very little. It's like ripping a few legs off a starfish. Not only do you not kill the starfish, but each leg you tore off then because an entirely new starfish. Killing a few here and there, keeps them fired up. Slaughtering tons of them might make an impression but as I said, we are too moral to undertake such a mission. Sadly, that may be our undoing.

    Enjoying your posts immensely.

  16. Exactly Stacey,

    They specifically don't want E Europe. For that matter they protest even when they're settled in rural parts of Germany or Sweden.

    They want to recreate their own societies in major Western European cities, no-go zones financed by taxpayers.

    Step 1 if we want to win is close the borders, denaturalized and deport anyone associated with Islamist groups. Only then can we think about how to win the fight militarily.

  17. Anonymous29/12/15

    3 groups are contesting. Islamists, global socialists and nationalists. I count myself among the nationalists - peopel who believe in a national identity and borders. The int'l socialists have decided to use the islamists as a weapon against the nationalists. There's going to be a fight - let's win.

  18. Anonymous30/12/15

    Thomas Jefferson said that " errors of opinion may be tolerated, where reason is free to combat it ".
    We live in the so called "free" world, where " freedom" became " to be free to firmly believe in every nonsense told by political establishment and ideological muzzled media. Reality teaches that we have to watch to endless militant Islamic slaughters, like the Bataclans, the 9/11s, the Madrid trains, the knife-intifadas, the San Bernardinos... meanwhile moderate Islam inspires immigration and House Resolutions, like 569. In other words, the Moderate holds the feet of the victims, meanwhile the Militant chops off heads. In January President Hollande turned away from the bloody hypercacher scenery his chubby head, and stated that the first victims of terror violence ( you don't believe it! ) are the Muslims... In Italy foreign minister Gentiloni affirmed that militant Islam need to be fought with... Islam! His predecessor, now High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security, Mrs Mogherini, is even happy to welcome Political Islam as part of Europe's game. Bundeskanzlerin Merkel restated firmly this year that " Islam belongs to Germany ", whitewashing German Holocaust guilt with welcoming Muslims immigration policy. Swedens welfare state is collapsing under the burden of Muslim immigration. Viking women became " free game " for male Muslim immigrants, but foreign minister Wallstrom's principal concern is to blame as much as possible Israel because " oppressing " poor Palestinians. A member of Swedish parlament considered that stern commitment related to a sort of " Israel-La Tourette syndrome ". The situation in UK is exausively explained by Melanie Phillips in her book " Londonistan ". President Obama... well, I think that landmark Cairo-speech 2009 suffices.
    Returning on Jefferson's statement, what we see nowadays are a huge number of opinion errors about Islam. Errors chiefly dued to our denial to properly study Islam. As Mr David Wood correctly said: " Islam's greatest ally in the West is West's ignorance about Islam ". The reason of above shall be really free where brains are emptied from toxic mainstream misleadings, and start to formulate fresh and true questions, instead to await false answers.

    Happy new year, Mr Greenfield. Thank you for your important work.

    Clelia&Eric, Italian Province, Eurabia

  19. Anonymous31/12/15

    No comments...

  20. Jitendra. Thacker.3/1/16

    You have hit the nail right on the head. I hope Donald Trump is the next President of USA.

  21. Yes all true. I was in an Arab cafe in Southern France the day after Paris and the celebrations were on. However the vexing question of why the ruling elite condone the destruction of our hard fought for societies is perplexing to me. I do not believe they are coordinated I think it maybe that they have so lost touch with the rest of us that they do not really care outside of well trodden known social interventions around welfare education and health that they are expected to deliver on.


Post a Comment

You May Also Like