Home The Self-Destructing Jihad
Home The Self-Destructing Jihad

The Self-Destructing Jihad

The paradox of the Islamic Jihad being waged against the West, is that it is a Jihad that is itself parasitic on the West. It could not exist without Western money and Western support. Without these it would quickly shrivel up and die.

There are few better demonstrations than Abu Hamza or Captain Hook living on the dole in the UK while preaching terrorism. Abu Hamza is simply a microcosm of Islamic terrorism which feeds off the West, from the Saudi sponsored Jihad funded by Western oil money and protected by American tanks to Pakistan's ISI backing of the Mujahadeen which would not have been possible without American support to Fatah's terrorist infrastructure now being revitalized by the State Department-- Islamic terrorism is dependent on the West.

The reason that most Arab states exist in the first place is that they were created by England or France and funded by the United States. The House of Saud and the entire fiction of Saudi Arabia was created with British and American support. The Arab League was organized by the British and when they discarded it, the United States picked it up in order to use it as a bulwark against Communism.

About the only real export of these Arab states is oil and this oil was discovered and developed by primarily American companies which were then slowly taken over and in effect nationalized by these Arab countries. The ruler of the House of Saud, Ibn Saud, began as a bandit and camel raider in the desert at the turn of the century. American and British patronage turned him into a monarch and turned Saudi Arabia into a wealthy land. The House of Saud turned around and has backed Islamic terrorism and expansionism across Europe, America and the World.

Saudi money drives the global Jihad but Saudi money and oil are really American money and oil. It was American tanks that kept Saddam out of Riyadh in 1992. But it is in fact America that has kept most of the Arab world intact. It was America which forced England, France and Israel to pull out of Egypt in the 1956 Suez Canal War. Egypt rewarded America for this by inviting the Russians in. It was American influence that kept Russia from going into Iran instead of Afghanistan. Today Iran is America's worst enemy. The list goes on and on.

If America and Europe did not exist, does anyone really believe that oil hungry world powers like Russia or China or Japan would have allowed the tinpot bandit Emirs and Princes and Tyrants of the Arab countries to keep control of their oil for very long? It was the long hand of America that protected them all along. For all their wealth and brutality, no Arab state has managed to defeat even tiny Israel, how long would they have lasted against Russia or China?

Not only has America protected their independence, it has even allowed them to nationalize resources developed by American and British companies. The United States has pumped in money and sacrificed the lives of American soldiers to protect them, in return we have received terrorism, oil boycotts and the funding of Islamic expansionism on our own soil.

Rarely has ingratitude been so viciously manifest, but all this goes to show that the Jihad is a self-destructing Jihad. The Jihad is aimed at the West, yet it could not exist without the West. The Islamic terrorists attacking America resemble an angry passenger carving a hole in his lifeboat in the hopes that everyone else in the lifeboat drowns while he somehow swims to safety.

The Arab world has produced nothing in the last century, its technology and its money come from outside. Its literacy level is below that of Sub-Saharan Africa and its labor, from its oil production to its simplest tasks is done by imported foreigners, often Westerners.

The self-destructing Jihad, should it destroy the West, would leave the Middle East barren, without customers for its oil, tourists for its cities, workers for its oil operations and protection for its kingdoms.

If the West responds by cutting immigration and achieving oil independence, then the Middle East will wind up with an economy based on worthless oil and a demographic time bomb turned against itself.

Either way the Jihad loses. The Jihad may succeed in either pushing the world back to the dark ages or at least turn the Middle East into fanatical Mullah and Imam ruled enclaves, but it won't create a new Islamic civilization, only chaos and dark ages. In Iraq and Gaza, the Jihad quickly degenerated into Muslims killing Muslims. This is nothing new, the Jihad in the end has always turned against fellow Muslims.

When Muslims in the West wage Jihad, these engineers and doctors also attack the very system that provides them with a generous income and generates the technology and resources that makes their profession possible. When Muslims in the Middle East wage Jihad, they attack their best customers and the source of their protection and wealth. One way or another the Jihad is engineered to kill the Goose with the Golden Egg and is literally a suicide Jihad, because its success would destroy the very sources of that Jihad.


  1. Anonymous10/12/07

    Ahoy matey, Arrrrrr, But why are you using a photo of the illustrious Captain Hook in yer story? Arr, shiver me timbers.

  2. I heard Ayn Rand say she would take the oil away from them completely .
    The British discovered it and she felt they should just take it and use it.
    The west has conscience and decency which the rest of the world in the main, do not. So they try for even handedness. it does not work with some.

  3. Anonymous10/12/07

    Sultan, while the Arabs seem to be generally incompetent militarily against Israel perphaps that is the Hand of Hashem, as Egypt had at least some succeses against the French and English during the Suez Campaign.

    Also the issue you raised about the Jihad being self-destructive is proven by Islamic history while the Muslims were able to create massive empires through Jihad these empires, from the Umadiyah to the Turks, were either completely destroyed or weakened to the point of being easy pickings by the inability of the rulers to stop their subjects from waging Jihad against even the empire they were part of.

  4. Anonymous10/12/07

    Arab success can be chalked up to dumb luck.
    They are divided among themselves so they will never get very far in the end but will turn on one another also. Their religion is cruel and hateful.

  5. Can't resist. Who has an IQ of 110? muzlims. (mischievous giggle)

  6. Sorry, but I disagree. What we see as self-destructive, jihadis see as victorious. They are not after 9th century Islamic civilization, but after 7th century Islamic conquest. They see conquest, pillaging and extermination as glory, and total poverty as Golden Age. True, their resources are from the West, but even without them they will keep fighting, on horseback and with swords if necessary. It is very dangerous to say, "No need to worry, they'll self-destruct," because they might very well destroy everything and everyone as they also "self-destruct," and they would see it as a victory. That is their goal. They are "spiritual" in the worst sense of the word.

  7. oh my message is not 'don't worry they'll self-destruct'

    they will self-destruct but in the way that rome under the goths self-destructed, that's not a pretty picture and the process will mean the deaths of tens of millions, the destruction of the west and the end of western civilization


Post a Comment

You May Also Like