David Letterman’s departure isn’t the end of an era. The era of late night talk shows ended a while back.
In Johnny Carson’s final week in the nineties, he played to an audience of twenty million. Lately, Letterman has been lucky to get 2 million. His final shows have played to around 5 million viewers.
Late night talk shows still exist, but their intended audience mainly watches viral clips from them the next day. The average age of Letterman’s audience is 54. CBS hopes that the equally smarmy Stephen Colbert will be able to bring his younger audience demo with him, but even Jimmy Fallon couldn’t bring down the average age demo all that much. Colbert will shave a few years off and then spend his time getting old and stale. Even before then, the networks will collapse and take his new job with it.
The Late Show isn’t a beloved American institution. It was created by Letterman’s inflated sense of entitlement. It failed in its purpose, as Letterman lost to Leno, and it won’t outlive Letterman by long.
The tributes to Letterman carry heavy doses of media self-importance and self-pity. And these days the two are one and the same. The media isn’t really nostalgic for Letterman’s smarmy laugh; it’s mourning the loss of a time when limited options maintained captive audiences for every fellow media dork awarded a big three network microphone and its incredible power of nationwide prime time airtime.
It’s a power that doesn’t seem all that impressive now when worldwide audiences are a click away.
That’s why the controversies over Brian Williams or George Stephanopoulos are tempests in a broken teapot. The days when a Walter Cronkite could embody the news are gone. The days when a David Letterman sneer could drive public opinion have gone with it. In his last years, Letterman was trying and failing to compete, not with Jay Leno, but with a world of YouTube base jumping and cat video clips.
Younger hosts are slobbering over Letterman to be able to pretend that they too are a direct link to Dick Cavett or Johnny Carson, instead of glorified Buzzfeed employees whose real job is producing 2-minute clips viral enough that next morning mobile users will wait through a 30-second ad to watch them.
Like the leftovers of the media, Letterman’s job had become a comfortable sinecure. He said all the right things about how awful Republicans were, even if no one was paying attention, and in return his colleagues in the media avoided asking too many uncomfortable questions about his sexual harassment, the resulting manufactured blackmail incident and the toxic environment behind the curtain.
It’s this same culture of complicity that allowed Brian Williams to get away with telling so many crazy lies for so long or allowed George Stephanopoulos to play journalist. The mafia has nothing on the media when it comes to keeping quiet about the sins of progressive colleagues. He may have been a sleazeball who had issues with women, but like the BBC’s Jimmy Savile, he was their sleazeball.
When Letterman compared Sarah Palin to a "slutty flight attendant" or joked about her 14-year-old daughter being “knocked up”, that was the host that female employees had complained about being applauded for his behavior by a progressive audience and its media gatekeepers.
It was okay because the target was a right-wing foe. But to Letterman, it was just okay. Period.
Dave’s media pals forgave his many sins. The biggest of these may have been that he wasn’t funny. No matter how much the media tried to prop him up as the thinking man’s late show host, audiences knew better. A decade in, Letterman had fallen into the bad habit of many successful comedians of beating a routine into the ground. But his awkward fumbling comedy had never been funny to begin with.
Beating it into the ground only made it worse.
Comedy has become politically tribal. The only safe subjects for humor are jokes at the comedian’s own expense and the ridicule of outgroups in order to reinforce the prejudices of the ingroup community. The showy insecurity or awkwardness of progressive comedians like Jon Stewart and Letterman serves as cover for the degraded state of their comedy which consists of pointing and laughing at the other tribe.
Letterman had anticipated the progressive direction of comedy. He had been ahead of his time in realizing that the only truly safe jokes in a politically correct media environment are aimed at Republicans. He had understood that arch knowingness counted for more than sharp comedic timing or a quick wit because it would seem like intelligence and even sincerity to duller audience members.
He knew that the media would not care if he was funny, only that he carried forward its agenda. If he didn’t, it would call him a sellout and a hack. If he did, it would pretend to laugh at all his jokes.
Most of all he realized that politically correct comedy needs an edgy façade to mask its cowardice.
Progressive comedy is above all else lazy and Letterman was the laziest man in comedy. He had more staffers than Eisenhower all to deploy the thousandth itineration of the same joke. He used his power to fill the time slots after him with hosts who couldn’t possibly compete with him to avoid being Conaned.
He was not a liberal by conviction, but out of laziness. When challenged by guests like Bill O’Reilly, he quickly folded. His politics were not thought out, they were unthinking. For all his pretense of eccentricity, he was a conformist who understood that if he played the game, he would get paid. His comic personality, the folksy skepticism and detached disdain served up in measured doses to viewers, was calculated to cover up this essential attribute that defined his enormously lucrative career.
Letterman is a professional sycophant who limos off into the sunset to the strains of the sycophantic braying of a dying industry. As audiences dwindle, the media has become its own audience, mourning the passing of its glorious past by taking hits of nostalgia from its heady days of power and privilege.
The mournful tributes piling up in his wake aren’t about him. Network television is dying. Letterman was one of its last national figures. If you think mainstream media outlets are carrying on over his exit, wait until network television dies its inevitable demographic death.
Then the media will really have something to cry about.
Excellent and true... as usual!ReplyDelete
Well, thank you, Daniel, for that. I was afraid no one had the umph to say what is so blatantly true. I should have known you would.ReplyDelete
Only thing left to say - RIP late night promotion TV disguised as entertainment.
This guy was always a pain in the ass. The attempts at humor were ALWAYS at someone else's expense and emanated from a mean core. I never saw his face that I didn't wanna' smack him. StevethirdReplyDelete
I rarely watched late night shows after Carson, but I did watch the final goodbye show, full of liberals full of themselves, many of them on the downside of any kind of career. As always, entertainers should stay out of politics while in the public eye. Like Robert Redford saying if you don't like Obama you are a racist. I still feel that's why he was snubbed with his last movie and was bitter about it. Clooney holding 25,000 a plate dinners for Obama when the rest of the country is suffering under progressive failed programs. He's on the way out, too, because most people outside the media are finally accepting these so called Liberals are just more rich guys making money by calling everyone else oppressors. Letterman spouted phony unemployment figures, claimed Obama made gas prices go down, and totally ignored the mess the first black Muslim president has made of the Middle East and how we are arming all the fighters on all sides. I would almost bet Letterman switches sides because it is no longer a benefit to him to be a racist, lying Liberal. It was his time to go south and take all his staff with him.ReplyDelete
I watched Dick Cavette tell Virgil Thompson on live TV that he was a 3rd rate composer. Camille Sans Saens described himself as a 2nd rate composer. I doubt Dick Cavett would even recognize when he heard first rate music. Talking Heads.ReplyDelete
Jay Leno was the one and only kosher one, and he wasn't even Jewish. But okay he was, and funny.ReplyDelete
Daniel nails another one.ReplyDelete
Carson was an institution. Leno could be moderately funny at times, and he is a gearhead. Letterman thought himself smarter than the people who made would make up his audience. It got old fast.
WoW, at least someone thinks the same as me that Letterman was/is not funny..never was...I was berated by so many people saying I didn't understand humour...I feel vindicated.ReplyDelete
Now, this may be "infantile" to some, but when I first saw this, I laughed so much, I had a belly ache...8 mins of a YT video made me laugh for hours...
Now I understand why I never bothered to tune him in.ReplyDelete
Network Broadcasting defined. "we talk you - sit there and take it"ReplyDelete
Steaming hot take. I award no points.ReplyDelete
I'm glad someone finally published this. He was a bore and as for being funny....he was only funny looking. As for the rest of the enemedia's views. Who exactly watches these people anyway? Are the watching or is the TV merely on?ReplyDelete
Once while I was in the waiting room of an outpatient surgical center, they had the brilliance to have the TV in the reception area blaring with old Johnny Carson reruns. Imagine a room full of people awaiting surgeries and colonoscopies who should be nervous, and instead they are laughing their heads off! I'll bet they recovered post-op faster, too. It was clean, it was corny, and it was FUNNY - and at no one else's expense.ReplyDelete
King David he was, is, and shall be.ReplyDelete
SNL comedy, even in its first glory days, had an obvious mean streak, too. Hipness is supposed to excuse everything.ReplyDelete
If you replaced letterman with snl, you could have two articles.ReplyDelete
@ Mushroom and Anonymous: "Letterman thought himself smarter..", "...always at someone else'e expense.." Those two phrases define his humour. I stopped watching him EARLY on. Life is too short to waste on him.ReplyDelete