Kamala Calls for Wrecking America to Make Her President

Pack the Supreme Court, pack the Senate and pack the country - or you’re racist

The good news is that Hillary Clinton is no longer the worst presidential sore loser ever. The bad news is that Hillary at least confined herself to putting the country through hell for four years by spreading the false claim that Trump was a secret Russian agent, leading to covert surveillance, government investigations, mass censorship and a near coup until her big lie finally fell apart.

The really bad news is that Kamala Harris is proving to be an even worse sore loser and in her latest bid for attention and power ahead of the 2028 primaries, has proposed packing the Supreme Court, abolishing the Electoral College and making D.C. and Puerto Rico into states.

Pack the Supreme Court, pack the Senate and pack the country or you’re racist.

The endgame is making America into California: a one-party state where not even the worst Democrat can lose an election. The advantages of this for Kamala Harris, who wasn’t able to win a primary or an election outside California, are obvious when going into the 2028 election.

Kamala called her proposal to rig the federal government at every level a “no bad ideas brainstorm” while complaining that the Supreme Court was “backdooring racism” (whatever that means) and “in that no bad ideas brainstorm, we talk about what we need to do and think about doing around the Electoral College. We talk about the idea of Supreme Court reform, which includes expanding the Supreme Court. We invite a conversation about multi-members districts,” and then proposed, “let’s talk about statehood for Puerto Rico and D.C.”

Despite being a law school graduate, an attorney general and holding other positions that would seem to require some familiarity with the English language, Kamalaspeak usually needs to be translated into English, but you get the general idea. Kamala would like to move forward every bad idea for rigging the country while insisting that there are really no bad ideas.

Not if they put her in power. Pity that some old dead white men 250 years ago disagreed.

Beyond the previously mentioned rigging bad ideas, Kamala also brought up multi-member districts, which is curious since black civil rights groups used to oppose multi-member districts and call them racist. Whitcomb v. Chavis went all the way to the Supreme Court and argued that a multi-member district in Indiana violated the Voting Rights Act. As recently as last year, the NAACP had filed a civil rights complaint over multi-member districts in Georgia.

So why is Kamala suddenly embracing a system that was condemned as racist? Because someone in the party’s election rigging system had decided that multi-member districts somewhere, likely in redder parts of the country, could dilute Republicans and elevate Democrats. And just like that multi-member districts went from being the new Jim Crow to the new civil rights movement.

Kamala, whose ancestry isn’t African-American, has been insincerely playing her stolen race card for her entire political life purely to advance her political career without ever believing in it. The same woman who accused Joe Biden during the primary debates of contributing to the imaginary racial oppression that she suffered as a child thousands of miles away in Southern California and then went to work for him, who claimed that she experienced segregation as a child there and recently bought a mansion in an area that is 0% black is an opportunist.

Kamala cloaks her proposals for dismantling America in the language of racial oppression and liberation, invoking the ancestors on “whose broad shoulders we stand” as justification for tearing apart the political system, but her ‘ancestors’ were in India or in Jamaica, not America.

Their “broad shoulders” offer no standing room in the American political system.

Like Hillary Clinton, who also cloaked her personal ambition in an equally insincere feminism considering her role in covering up her husband’s sexual assaults on women and their friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, Kamala keeps trying to find ways to make ‘me’ sound like ‘we’. All politicians do that, but the level of hubris being exercised by Kamala is unequaled since Aaron Burr proposed toppling America to make up for being snubbed by Jefferson and Hamilton.

After being rejected by voters, Democrat or Republican, white, black and Latino, men and women, in every election that she ran in, Kamala is proposing to fold, spindle and mutilate the American political system until the anchor baby of two foreign America-hating students can finally win.

As awful as Obama’s politics and policies were, he did once enjoy genuine support. That’s something Kamala has never had. She’s underperformed in every election outside California (and elections inside California are about as trustworthy as those in Chicago, Cuba and North Korea) with every conceivable electorate. As Democrats fight each other over the unreleased 2024 election autopsy, the one thing that you can bet it will never mention is that Kamala’s political track record outside her own state consisted of burning through money for nothing.

By an utterly wild coincidence, that was also the outcome in the 2024 presidential election.

Rather than accept the blame for being a terrible candidate, Kamala has blamed everyone else, the party, the electorate, and the nation, except herself, in her transparently self-pitying memoir, ‘107 Days’. Her message, again and again, was that Americans were too racist and sexist to vote for her, now she’s proposing to remedy the problem with an election that she can’t lose.

What kind of idea is that? A very bad idea from a very bad person.

Obama was often slurred as a narcissist. The Chicago politician was indeed narcissistic, thin-skinned, petty and egotistical, a man clearly in love with his own image, and disdainful of all others, but he did at least have some radical political dice to hang from his rearview mirror. Kamala has no politics and no convictions and nothing except a shallow imitation of the radicalism of others. When Obama was destroying America, he was doing it in the service of a cause, while Kamala is proposing to destroy America because it stands in the way of her ego.

And even when it comes to that, she has no ideas of her own, which is why, like a dimly retarded mob boss or brainless dictator, she’s soliciting a “no bad ideas brainstorm” from stooges to tell her what parts of America to smash that she can sit in the Oval Office. If she starts a civil war along the way, it makes no difference as long as her $8.5 million Malibu mansion is intact.

It makes Hillary Clinton seem like she belongs on Mount Everest by comparison.

The only redeemable thing about Kamala Harris is that she’s an idiot. A smarter politician, a Hillary Clinton for example, might be able to formulate a plan or finish a sentence. But Kamala is the kind of leader that a party whose only identity is using identity politics and class warfare to justify a revolutionary takeover could end up with. There are already countless Kamalas scattered throughout Congress, local politics and the bureaucracy who confuse civil rights with ego. Kamala is the representative of a particular class, singularly useless, unforgivably stupid and militantly mulish in the conviction that they ought to be the queens of the entire universe.

Even when they can no more utter a coherent sentence than fly to D.C. by flapping their arms.

Will Democrats set the country on fire and start a civil war for Kamala? Unlikely. But leftists will be happy to use her or anyone else to start a war or impose a dictatorship if given a chance.

Between the radicals and the hacks, the radicals want to burn it all down, while the hacks will invite their “no bad idea brainstorms” as long as they think they will rule over the ashes.

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center’s Front Page Magazine.

Click here to subscribe to my articles. And click here to support my work with a donation.

Thank you for reading.

Read my book ‘Domestic Enemies: The Founding Fathers’ Fight Against the Left’ to discover the true origins of the American Left.