But what’s the use of leaving Afghanistan if we’re going to bring it with us to America?
The “interpreter” scam is one of the longest running immigration hoaxes on record.
Before the withdrawal, there were some 2,500 American soldiers in Afghanistan. After the withdrawal, there are around 600 soldiers left behind.
And there are 20,000 Afghan “interpreters” applying for SIVs or Special Immigrant Visas.
How can there be 20,000 interpreters for 2,500 soldiers?
It’s not as if we haven’t been handing out SIV visas like candy already.
48,601 of those SIVs went to Afghans. At its peak, under Obama, there were 100,000 American soldiers in Afghanistan. That’s an “interpreter” to every 2 soldiers.
By March 2021, 100,000 Afghans and Iraqis had been approved for SIVs.
But the vast majority of “interpreters” aren’t interpreters. They were “Afghan allies” working in some capacity with or for the United States. While the media keeps talking about 20,000 “interpreters” embedded with American forces, hardly any of the SIV applicants fall into that category. Applicants didn't even have to work for the United States. They could have worked for any of the over 50 countries taking part in the ISAF mission in Afghanistan. Not to mention any of the local subcontractors or aid groups that were being funded by the United States.
In 2016, 58 translators and 165 family members received visas. As did 4,283 government workers and 10,100 family members. In 2020, 19 interpreters and 58 family members received SIV visas and 1,829 government workers and their 6,134 family members. When the media claims that we’re leaving Afghan interpreters to die, it’s lying. There are few actual interpreters actually applying for SIVs. The vast majority of applicants were just making money from the U.S.
The visa inflation is driven by family members. Of the 100,000 SIV immigrants, 31,000 were the actual applicants, while another 69,000 were family members. The current list of applicants in the pipeline breaks down to 700 "interpreters" or principal applicants and 1,800 family members.
With 20,000 principal Afghanistan applicants, that means we could easily be looking at over 60,000 total Afghan immigrants in the short term. And the numbers may go as high as 100,000.
The long term numbers under family reunification programs would be absolutely staggering.
And the 20,000 number is still not the full total of principals. Just the ones in the system now. With a current deadline for applicants set to expire in December of next year, there’s plenty of time for more applicants to hop on the gravy train. And as Afghanistan collapses, there will be less scrutiny possible of the applicants, some of whom will already be waiting as refugees.
What’s the cost of all this to Americans?
The "interpreters" function more like refugees and “are eligible for the same resettlement assistance and federal public benefits as refugees”. In the past, 85% of SIV migrants, in partial numbers at least 60,000, received refugee aid and were resettled across the country.
The media claims that SIV migrants will quickly be able to adapt and adjust. Government data however shows that 60% of SIV migrants remained unemployed after 90 days, including 58% of those with "good spoken English" and 65% of those with "post-secondary education".
By 2017, SIVs made up a quarter of migrants receiving refugee resettlement assistance.
In one year, SIVs managed to account for 13% of the State Department’s resettlement programs and 8% of HHS’ refugee resettlement programs.
Even those SIV migrants who were employed could still be living off American taxpayers with a GAO report noting that, “of those SIV households receiving earnings from employment, 89
percent were also receiving income through Refugee Cash Assistance, Matching Grant, or TANF programs, which is slightly higher than the rate of the overall refugee population.”
Aside from the financial expense of bringing tens of thousands of migrants from a failed state to America, there’s the terrorism and criminal risks.
The media keeps claiming that all of the applicants have been screened and aren’t a threat.
Even a pro-SIV report noted, “As of 2019, the State Department only had one analyst conducting security checks for the backlog of over 18,000 applications.”
Immigration authorities ask an American “co-signer” to “certify that, to the best of his or her knowledge, you present no threat to the national security or safety of the United States” even if the co-signer only has a relationship with the Afghan’s “contract or sub-contract supervisor.”
With that sort of screening, it’s no wonder that some SIVs who have come to the United States have carried out violent attacks and allegedly became involved with Islamic terrorism.
Last month, the Biden administration demanded 8,000 more SIV visas. While the Democrats can’t directly bring all the applicants immediately here, they intend to move them to third countries from where they’ll be able to continue applying to enter the United States.
“The idea here is to be able to facilitate their departure from Afghanistan to another location so that they can complete the SIV process. Whether that leads to all of them coming to the United States or some, I mean, we just don't know. It'll be done on a case-by-case basis, but the idea is to be able to facilitate their departure from Afghanistan so that that processing can continue,” the Pentagon’s John Kirby said.
More radical voices however want to fly as many Afghans as possible to America right now.
Some media outlets, including the New York Times, are reporting potential numbers as high as 100,000 Afghans. That would mean evacuating some 2% of the population of Kabul here.
Such an invasion would have catastrophic consequences for Americans.
The United States has already handed out 100,000 SIVs to Afghans and Iraqis. We’re now looking at the possibility of another 100,000 with no real end in sight even after that.
Americans will have resettled an entire Tallahassee or Chattanooga worth of "interpreters".
Senator Mark Warner and Senator Marco Rubio have claimed that failing to bring the Afghans to America would be "a stain on our national conscience". The real stain on our conscience is politicians who put Americans last and put open borders migration first. Americans have spent countless blood and treasure fighting for the Afghans. But the Afghans won’t fight for themselves. As American forces leave, they’re deserting, surrendering, and retreating.
That’s their choice.
Over 2,000 Americans died for Afghanistan. No more Americans should die at home.
SIV visas have brought violent rapists and terrorists to America. Every single visa puts American lives and national security at risk.
The move to bring 100,000 Afghans to this country is a warning that it’s much easier to get Americans out of Afghanistan than it is to get Afghanistan out of America.
Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine.
Click here to subscribe to my articles.
Thank you for reading.
How many Somali interpreters did ex-President Obama bringhere to overrun Minneapolis-St. Paul?ReplyDelete
I am sure their children will quickly become Americanized and not radicalized.ReplyDelete
Of course, 1% becoming radicalized leads to quite a bit of disruption in our lives.
Sounds like human trafficking using tax money. How much goes to the big guy?ReplyDelete
The hell with them!ReplyDelete
If we don’t win, you don’t get the golden ticket, you get to hold off the Taliban yourselves.
Here it’s normal to help each other. Not the MuslimReplyDelete
World. Why would an Afghan “help” us? If our costly
“nation building” got us any thanks, he would be
loved at home, not hated for loving kafirs?
(Quran 3:28 not take unbelievers as friends)
Life there is a perpetual rip-off; we owe these
grifters nothing. After 9/11, we should have
clobbered Afghanistan and Saudi, who put up the
terrorists and money. Then left.
“It’s a Small World” in Disney Fantasyland is a
LIE that will get us killed. Accepting an Afghan
refugee is not like saving a baby bird fallen
from its nest. U.S. welfare is a fabulous jackpot
that proves our stupidity to him and justifies his
We'll continue losing the 1400-year zero-sum global War of Islamic Manifest Destiny until we all conclude that Islam and it's adherents are our existential enemy.ReplyDelete
Per Islamic Doctrine, co-existing isn't an option -- only winning or losing: 100% Islamic, or 0% Islamic. Therefore, the only objective for us that ends the war with our victory is Worldwide forced Islamic proscription (criminalization). This should be easy to justify already, since Islam is by definition a "Criminal Conspiracy."
Let's get started. The longer we wait, the more limited, desperate our options for victory will be.
Yours are the necessary and sufficient facts
for waging unlimited, unconditional victory
War on Islam. All True, yet prissy dolts gasp,
“Surely, you can’t mean...” They don’t have
to see the cruel conquest of Constantinople.
There are videos of ISIS and Boko Haram. All
censored. Time to flood the media with joyful
Muslims engaged in exquisite torture, burning,
carnage, rape. Show it all; over and over.
I'm not sure why the Afghans need visas to come to America. All they really need is enough money to make the trip to Mexico, where they can walk across the border to the U.S. like everybody else.ReplyDelete