Enter your keyword

Monday, February 01, 2021

'Palestinians' Demand 'Big Ben' Back

"The Jerusalem Clock is hidden in London today," Fatah, the political movement behind the PLO and the Palestinian Authority, asserts in a post titled, "Jerusalem Stolen Clock".

It goes on to claim that the British military ordered the clock tower dismantled. Then the "British moved the clock first to a new tower across from the municipality of Jerusalem, and transferred it to the British Museum in London, to become the famous British icon, 'Big Ben'."

How did Big Ben, which resides in a clock tower built in 1859, become a Muslim clock tower from the 20th century?

There are some other slight differences between the two and the “stolen clock” such as the fact that London's clock tower is 316 feet tall while the ‘Palestinian’ clock tower was only 42 feet.

But the story of the “Palestinian clock” is also the story of the entire myth of “Palestine”.

When you believe that the Jerusalem of King David and King Solomon was originally yours, you can just as easily believe that London’s Big Ben was originally the property of “Palestine”.

The “Palestinian clock” is as real as “Palestine”. The myth of a “Palestinian” people propounded by Fatah which has spent decades killing over it is also the story of the “Palestinian clock”.

There’s no more of a “Palestinian” people who were dispossessed by the Jews than Big Ben is a “Palestinian” clock stolen and passed off as London’s Big Ben. Both are fake history built out of resentments and garbled stories whose context has been lost, but whose hatreds remain real.

There were never any Palestinians. When the clock was built the region had been part of the Ottoman Empire, the last Caliphate until ISIS. The caliphates had settled it with Arab Muslim clans who dominated Christian refugees fleeing Muslim persecution, along with groups of other minorities from escaped slaves to gypsies, along with the indigenous Jewish population.

The Ottomans had become obsessed with clock towers as a symbol of their empire. But the Ottomans hadn’t invented them, they had adopted them from Europe, and planted them in major cities of the empire to create a common sense of time and belonging for their subjects.

Sultan Abdul Hamid II, the last real sultan of the empire, obsessively erected clock towers to show off how modern the Ottoman Empire was. But by then the Empire was anything but modern and Hamid's clock tower craze was powered by his German allies. Kaiser Wilhelm II gave Hamid a batch of clocks at the turn of the century which the Turks put into clock towers.

The Ottoman Empire erected some of its clock towers in Israel. These clock towers utilized the talents and funds of the indigenous Jewish and the Arab Muslim settler population. The clock tower projects in Israel began in 1901 which is also the date when Wilhelm sent Hamid a whole bunch of clocks. One of these clock towers was stuck on Jerusalem’s Jaffa Gate which Hamid had previously cut a hole in so that the Kaiser could enter Jerusalem in his tall plumed helmet.

The relationship between Germany and the Ottoman Empire destroyed the remnants of the “Sick Man of Europe” by dragging it into WWI and allowing the British to claim the region.

And the British decided to get rid of the eyesore of the Jaffa Gate Clock Tower by moving it.

The Jaffa Gate Clock Tower, built out of white limestone, would have looked nice in the town square of some British village. The British objection to it was that it was very European and didn’t belong with the biblical setting of the Jaffa Gate. They weren’t repressing a brilliant example of Islamic architecture, but a mediocre Islamic imitation of European architecture.

Critics at the time had called it “that damned German tower”.

Older Ottoman clock towers had been styled after minarets. The clock towers in Israel looked European. Paradoxically, the British got rid of the Jaffa Gate clock because it wasn’t “oriental” enough for their taste. They were trying to protect the traditional architectural character of the region only to be accused by the Muslim leaders in Jerusalem who saw the clock tower as a symbol of their accomplishment, of stealing their clock because its glory put Big Ben to shame.

There was no “Palestinian clock”. Just like there are no “Palestinians”.

The “Palestinian” clock likely used a German mechanism, was styled after European clock towers, and was a project of the Ottoman Empire. Not of any imaginary “Palestine”. Some saner “Palestinian” revisionist history diatribes shy away from claiming that Big Ben is the actual clock tower from Jaffa Gate due to the missing few hundred feet distingushing the two towers.

They claim that only the mechanism from the stolen “Palestinian clock” was used for Big Ben.

But the “Palestinian Clock” wasn’t some great triumph of Islamic science. It was most likely one of the Kaiser’s clocks. If the British had wanted a German clock mechanism, they would have bought it. And the Jaffa Clock Tower the Ottomans built in Jaffa (not to be confused with the Jaffa Gate one in Jerusalem) utilized the services of a Jewish clockmaker, Moritz Schoenberg.

Big Ben’s clock mechanism was genuinely revolutionary and the challenges of running giant clocks at hundreds of feet in freezing weather are very different than anything put together by the Ottomans for the modest clock towers plopped down for the Sultan’s 25th anniversary.

Transplanting the clock mechanism from the Jaffa Gate clock to Big Ben would be disastrous.

And yet the myth of the “Palestinian Clock”, the incredible work of genius that the British coveted so much that they turned it into Big Ben, nurtures a resentment built on a fake history.

“Palestine” is a German clock installed by the Ottoman Empire and transposed to Big Ben.

It’s the delusions of the former elite of a fallen Islamic empire passing down garbled resentments, spinning them into conspiracy theories, and building an identity around them. But when you research the claims they collapse into myths, legends, and fairy tales.

The “Palestinian” cause was built up by a few major Muslim ruling families in Jerusalem and Hebron not because they had lost a nation that never existed, but the status and power that came from being part of an occupying Islamic empire under which Jews were inferiors.

There was never a “Palestinian” nation or a people. There were influential clans, like the Husseini clan, whose members included Hitler’s Mufti and Yasser Arafat, who are not, despite their myths, descended from the Caananites let alone the Philistines, but came over from Egypt. Even after spending a generation trying to wipe out the indigenous Jewish population, when the revolution came and Israel won its independence, they were not driven out in a ‘Nakba’.

They left ahead of their invading Islamic armies that they expected to wipe out the Jewish population. And when that didn’t happen, they claimed to be an exiled “Palestinian” people.

Now their descendants recalling family legends have built up a story of a glorious Islamic clock that was stolen by the infidels and passed off as Big Ben. One day they’ll reclaim Big Ben and stick it on the Jaffa Gate again and take over all of Jerusalem. Meanwhile the Israelis have been caring for the remaining Ottoman clocks. The entire set, including the banished Jaffa Gate clock, have shown up on Israeli postage stamps. The Ottoman plaques with their praises of Allah have been left alone though other plaques praising G-d were sometimes added.

Where the Arab Islamic elites made it their practice to destroy and defile Jewish synagogues, cemeteries, and holy sites, the Israelis have preserved the legacy of Arab Islamic colonialism, along with the legacies of Greek, Roman, Crusader, and British colonial rule in Israel.

When the land actually belongs to you, there’s no need to revise and erase its history.

The “Palestine” myth compounds resentment with insecurity. The Ottoman Empire could be brutal and backward, but it accomplished something. All the Arab Islamic military colonists who built up dynasties under its shadow in backwaters like Israel have is someone else’s clock.

They traded their own shameful history as the camp followers of caliphates, pillagers and colonizers of someone else’s land, for an even more pathetic imaginary history as the “Palestinians”. They insist that as the “Palestinian” people, they are the true indigenous population of Israel even though they arrived there thousands of years after the fact.

Palestine was the name given by the Roman occupiers to Israel. The Romans associated the area with the Philistines: the sea peoples who had come from the Aegean to colonize it.

The “Palestinian” people have spent two generations claiming to be the original indigenous population because they’re using the name of a European people given to it by a European empire. Anyone that hopelessly ignorant might as well claim that Big Ben is part of “Palestine''.

When your entire history is fake, you can believe anything.





Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

This article first appeared exclusively at Front Page Magazine.

11 comments:

  1. Anonymous2/2/21

    Only one problem ... Big Ben is actually one of the bells in the clock tower, not the clock mechanism itself.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous2/2/21

    Brilliant! Arabic Numerals, Algebra, conscientious
    guardians of otherwise lost ancient knowledge, the
    fabled paradise of El Andaluz, Mesopotamia, and
    Ottoman Califate. Stolen glory. Just about the
    most pure bullshit there is.

    In three years (1978-80) backpacking through the
    Umma, I experienced more deceit and less substance
    than I could have imagined at the outset. Some
    were quite intelligent; sadly misdirected to self
    delusion and sophistry.

    Even rich oil states contract out professional
    services to foreigners, while natives live from
    fat doles.

    Charlie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People who need stolen glory, like stolen valor... etc...

      Delete
    2. Roger B3/2/21

      The first edition of Churchill's "The River War" contained the following (these paragraphs were struck from the second and following editions):

      "How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

      "A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

      "Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome."

      Delete
    3. Anonymous3/2/21



      Sir Winston Churchill penned the following, which appears in the first edition of his book' "The River Wars". These lines strangely are not seen in the second and subsequent editions.

      "How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

      "A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

      "Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome."

      Roger B.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous5/2/21

      Daniel and Roger;

      Thanks! Whether votary, dhimmi, or
      slain victim, the waste of glorious
      human potential is tragically profound.

      Let no one who values the sanctity of
      the individual equivocate: evil Islam
      must end now.

      Charlie

      Delete
  3. Ralph Jaeger2/2/21

    An excellent commentary on the so called Palestinian people’s, particularly the last paragraphs detailing the European origins of the name given to the region to denigrate any reference to the rightful Jewish inhabitants after they were driven out by the Romans.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, it's a basic point that so many miss.

      Delete
  4. Aisla Sinclair3/2/21

    The writing of a great man.
    On looking at the title ,the source of this tragicomic claim; I felt that I'd not have much to learn
    But boy. Wrong.
    The whole " Palestinian" farrago is laid out bare and simple.
    Wouldn't it be funny if it were not so tragic?
    Just imagine what the self identifying grievance farmers of " The Palestinian Cause" might be have created , had they not spent entire generations of blood and treasure(usually from guilty white idiots in the west) in trying to drive the hated Jooz into the Med.
    Of course, given the failure to be honest about their heritage and history, what else can they do but lie, contrive and blame everyone, anything but themselves and those leaders of theirs .
    All this said, once the UK BLM/ Antifa and Muslim, Jew baiting BDS types get back to campus( thank God, the anti Semitism is online and of no threat due to closing universities with Covid madness) , then Big Ben as a Muslim grievance will catch on. And our political caste members like Boris will yield within a few years.
    Great writing. Thanks DG.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Islam has been thrusting their 'myths,legends, and fairy tales' upon the civilized world for some 1700 years. It truly takes a Democrat's sense of revisionist history to proclaim that Palestinians/Islam can lay claim to King David's era...more than 3000 years in the past, and at least 1700 years before there was any Islam or 'Palestinian' anywhere on earth. They might do well to remember that Yasser Arafat clearly stated that there are no 'Palestinian' people...something PM Golda Meir and every other Israeli has long known. One might now imagine that with a new president installed in the former America that they'll again feel empowered.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. or the claims that there was an ancient mosque in Cuba and that Neil Armstrong converted to Islam

      Delete

Popular

Categories

Follow by Email