"Without a rifle you are nothing, worthless, you are waiting for death, any minute, any second."
"My father sent my mother a revolver as a gift, which for her was the symbol of what any young girl wants in a marriage, this was for her the means to stay alive, to kill herself or to die fighting."
Last week I had the opportunity to attend a screening of Defiance, based on the Oxford Press book, Defiance, the Bielski Partisans by Nechama Tec. For those who have the time, I would recommend the book over the movie, as the former is a real history of events, and the latter is a fictionalized Hollywood adaptation of them.
Nechama Tec's book, Defiance, the Bielski Partisans is a realistic but excellently written retelling of how the Bielski Otriad operated in the real world, its dedication to rescuing Jews, from refugees in hiding, to reaching inside Ghettos themselves, as well as dealing with its controversies.
In contrast to the movie, Nechama Tec's Defiance is a nuts and bolts look at life in the woods from multiple perspectives. It is not an exercise in romanticism, but in realism.
The story of the Bielskis is one of those stories of the Holocaust that is overshadowed by the general narrative of victimization and therefore rarely told, as compared to the depictions of Jews as helpless victims or dependent on non-Jewish saviors, ala Schindler's List. The story of the Bielskis is not a story of the Holocaust, so much as it is the story of how the Bielskis and those who worked with them broke through the helplessness, and took action to save thousands and keep them alive in hostile territory.
In contrast to the movie's portrayal of him, Tuvia Bielski is not a modern morally conflicted hero nor a misguided idealist. The book is less about personalities than it is about what was accomplished in the forest. Yet even the movie provides something deeply valuable in the portrayal of the Holocaust.
Liberal culture has made the Holocaust into a narrative of victimization that can only be undone by tolerance. Defiance, in both book and movie form, turns into a narrative of accomplishment by a few in the face of a seemingly unstoppable enemy. The Jews of Defiance are not victims, they are taught to take responsibility for their survival by the Bielskis. They do not simply wait for the war to be over, but Tec's book documents how they rescue other Jews, and they fight back, blowing up trains, and hitting Nazi targets.
The conventional narrative of the Holocaust, both liberal and religious, is one of learned helplessness, of martyrdom, either in the name of tolerance, or holiness. Defiance instead upends that in favor of competence, of taking responsibility for one's own survival and that of others, and making a difference. It is the conceptual idea behind the State of Israel, and so unsurprisingly one of the forest encampments was called "Jerusalem in the Woods."
The usual liberal narrative teaches that when tolerance fails, a Holocaust happens. But tolerance is relative, while competence is objective. Understanding what the Bielski Otriad accomplished is far more important to understanding how to deal with the persecution of Jews, than all the narratives of atrocities and massacres, which memorialize the dead, but fail to draw any useful lessons from what happened to them. And the only useful lesson that can be drawn from the Holocaust, is how to survive it and defeat it.
Watching Defiance made me think of how fundamentally wrong most other movies have gotten the Holocaust. The poster child of all of them of course was Schindler's List, a grandstanding and hollow project, whose two major stars played Germans on opposite sides of the Holocaust, and whose them was about the importance of doing the right thing. But movie after movie has followed a similar pattern, turning the Holocaust into a vehicle for communicating something uplifting about the human spirit, and the general wonderfulness of humans, when they aren't busy shoving other humans into gas chambers or dark pits. Jakob the Liar, Life is Beautiful, The Pianist all suffer from that same need to turn an atrocity into something meaningful.
Defiance though is one of the few Holocaust movies, that is actually a war movie. It is not about finding meaning, as much as it is about the hard realities of survival, and what must be done to survive. Being a Hollywood movie it still suffers from the need to insert uplifting messages about the human spirit, but these quickly pass. But they quickly pale beside the reality of the choices that the Bielski brothers need to make. As often as the movie attempts to "straighten out" the story by directing it along a politically correct route, the truth of the real story bends it back to where it began.
The Bielski brothers are no saints, but start out as smugglers who end up using their survival skills to gather a large community of survivors under them. At times they're ruthless and like everyone else, they're walking wounded, dealing with the loss of their families, while being expected to make impossible decisions that mean life and death for everyone around them. But there are no therapists in the forest, only life and death decisions.
Much as the score layers on inappropriately uplifting music and the writing summons the occasional inspirational line about hope, faith and humanity-- Defiance's heart is in the forest where the needs are primitive and survival rests on the ability to get food and weapons and to stay ahead of the Germans and their local police collaborators.
And stripped of all the questions and philosophical musings, Defiance is one of the few movies to deal with what the Holocaust was about. Surviving. The Holocaust boils down to the simple fact that many of the groups who hated the Jews got a chance to kill them, under the leadership of German Fascism and administered with ruthless technical precision. Reactions across the Jewish populations covered a wide gamut that history has barely scratched, from apathy to flight, to denial to collaboration, to resistance.
The Bielskis and the fighters, criminals and working class youth, have the survival skills that the Malbushim, the middle and upper class university educated Jews do not. That meant knowing how to use a gun, how to find your way through the woods, how to build working shelters and ultimately how to survive by making ad hoc decisions under pressure. It also meant being able to eat anything and make food out of anything, including a horse and a dog, to rob and to kill. There is nothing "natively" uplifting about any of that. It is simply what it takes to survive.
And that, rather than the uplifting messages, serves as the real lesson of the Holocaust. You either survive, or you don't. The Holocaust is not a call for tolerance or for sanctifying victimization, those are the liberal American Jewish fallacies. The Holocaust was a wake up call, warning that none of the strategies that Jews had used until now, negotiation, waiting, appeasement, all defense reactions had been nullified. You could give up, run if you could, or fight to survive.
Israel was built on the understanding that the time for running was over. It was time to get serious about being a nation, or live as hunted animals the world over. The American liberal Jewish consensus by contrast was built on the belief that the best way to prevent a Holocaust was to teach people to love each other and find something uplifting in it all, thus buying into the culture of victimization. Defiance tries to reach for the latter position, but finds itself stuck in the former camp instead. Because as many noble and uplifting things that Tuvia can say, the Bielskis, both the real and the fictional film versions, were no liberals.
The movie portrays a tug of war between the two older Bielski brothers, over focusing on pure resistance or rescuing people. But that division leads both brothers to disaster, as Tuvia discovers that he needs his sibling's ruthlessness and Zus' participation in a Russian partisan unit leads to the realization that the Communists have just as little use for the Jews as the Nazis do. The balance of Tuvia's idealism and Zus' cynical killing edge defines the conflict, as Tuvia discovers that he must be hard and brutal in order to do good, and Zus discovers that killing without a people of his own to protect is a cold and soulless task.
Though the movie may insert inappropriate comic relief and its versions of the Bielski brothers are at times so incompetent that they would not have survived for a week, let alone for years, it does what Holocaust movies all too often avoid doing, it focuses on the survival. The Germans, when they arrive, are soldiers in gray moving in and out. The locals collaborate or don't, for their own reasons. There is no moral to be learned, except that if you want to live and want others to live, you must be prepared to do what it takes.
That is the first and foremost lesson of the Holocaust to be learned. For all the unanswered moral, philosophical and theological questions-- the bottom line is that millions of Jews were killed, because they could be. The only true defense against a Holocaust is the ability to resist and to survive one. Before the State of Israel was officially declared, the Bielskis made their own Jewish state in a forest, to live as free men and women mere kilometers from their would be killers, and though like the real state and its real leaders, they may have been flawed, their triumph is not some uplifting moral, but a matter of accomplishment, the 1200 they hid in the forest against all odds, and through determination and hard work, they did not become victims or fatalities, they survived. And through their guidance and efforts so did 1200 others. No higher praise is needed.
They showed that life is too precious not to be fought for.ReplyDelete
It certainly does seem different from other Holocaust movies. I'll definitely see this one.ReplyDelete
Keep your powder dry, boys.ReplyDelete
As you wrote," sanctifying victimization", from the theater show on Anne Frank in the 50s to the Pianist, this is exactly what the liberals have introduced to the uninformed and unthinking. It has latched on the "poor palestinians" in an obscene inverted moral with them as the Jews and us as the nazis. It's the basis of "multiculturalism", "post modernism" "post colonialism", any post you want and it is inculcated in the brains of the youths from schools to universities. Everything comes from this sanctification of victimology (merited or not), everyone is entitled to the victim status--except the real victims, the Jews. Hence we have Shoa denial, terrorism denial and lately katiusha attacks denial.ReplyDelete
I read Defiance and am also reading the other book The Belski Brothers - I think they were a bit more complicated then you make them. They were politically astute - they had to handle the Russian paritsans who weren't crazy about sharing the limited food supply with hundreds of non-fighting Jews. They were peasants, and in the forest environment, the peasants were on top. Defiance is an amazing book, because it deals with the class structure of the Jews at the time as well as the amazing gifts of the brothers. BTW, Asael was the second oldest, not Zus - which seems to be have switched around for the movie.ReplyDelete
Tuvia had some political understanding, but handling the Communists was a very tricky matter of survival skills. They had to be able to operate along with them, without letting them take over. And finally had to extract their people from Russian hands.ReplyDelete
They were certainly more complicated than any simple narrative can make them out to be, as I've said myself. And Tuvia's military background was certainly a major asset.
THANKS FOR THIS INFO, something i knew very little about.ReplyDelete
and i know a fair amount on this subject.
yochanan of lgf
There are many stories like this that remain out of sight because no one promotes themReplyDelete
you might be interested in the documentary Jerusalem in the Woods
Very good post. Makes me think of Kohelet, of what happens has happened before...and will occur again.
As with Yehuda ben Matatiyahu, and then again with ben Kosibah (bar Kochba).
I "tie in" my point: some won (Yehuda), some lost (ben Kosibah), but it is to stand...to attempt to live, to go on..that matters.
As Yehudim, let us never allow the hands of men to force us to go "gently into that good night." Where man is concerned, it is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.
Hoping everyone had a nice Chanukkha.
If you only had visual design skills as good as your writing skills, this would be a famous blog.
Dear Sultan Knish,ReplyDelete
For way too long the malbushim of the culture industry, especially the professionals in the "no business like Shoah business," have had virtually undisputed hegemony. This time Defiance, the 2008 American war film directed by Edward Zwick, gets it right. Your review almost gets it right too except when you too narrowly speak about "liberal American Jewish fallacies." The malbushistic ideology you rightly condemn is not the sole property of liberal American sons and daughters of Moses. It's a central cultural postulate of all liberals who depend on others to do the dirty work of civilization. It's the shibboleth of all malbushim who take pride in how clean their hands are.
There is one more movie about the "fighting", I mean Uprising, 2oo1.ReplyDelete
Although the actors, the idea and how the movie was made, was not so bad, Uprising actually is not so good as Defiance, i don't know why weis :)
Uprising was an NBC miniseries about the Warsaw Ghetto, so a TV movie filled out with TV actors, aside from Liev Schreiber being in bothReplyDelete
that's why not so good
Have you read this book about partisans. A "must read"ReplyDelete
"No Time to Mourn: The True Story of a Jewish Partisan Fighter"