tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post1777853370377597027..comments2024-03-28T03:24:11.539-04:00Comments on Daniel Greenfield / Sultan Knish Articles at DanielGreenfield.org : Proof: Ron Paul Lied About Not Being the Author of the NewslettersDaniel Greenfieldhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13575285186581875356noreply@blogger.comBlogger19125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-64708780385621142652008-01-14T03:56:00.000-05:002008-01-14T03:56:00.000-05:00Note that American society has become so pandering...Note that American society has become so pandering, so PC that a person who did not vote for MLK day has to pretend he did to seem 'nice'?<BR/>I find that a rotten commentary.<BR/>If he didnt vote so what? It is not mandatory to vote for someone you don't think deserves a day of their own. <BR/>It is time people took back their voices and let free choice begin in this nation once again.<BR/>I would not have voted for it either.Chana @ Lemon Lime Moonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11656854855385193867noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-62301992158994339052008-01-13T19:16:00.000-05:002008-01-13T19:16:00.000-05:00actually i also noted that the author was a flight...actually i also noted that the author was a flight surgeon and ran for president in 88 on the libertarian ticket<BR/><BR/>now it could all just be somebody impersonating Ron Paul but that brings us into the realm of conspiracy theories and if Ron Paul wants to claim that, he's going to have to prove it<BR/><BR/>as to your claim about Ron Paul voting for MLK Day, that's a blatant lie<BR/><BR/>http://ronpaulsurvivalreport.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-on-ron-paul-and-martin-luther-king.htmlDaniel Greenfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13575285186581875356noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-59652056628722213522008-01-13T18:09:00.000-05:002008-01-13T18:09:00.000-05:00Ah, so you're the one who "proved" that Ron Paul w...Ah, so you're the one who "proved" that Ron Paul wrote the MLK article. Your proof being that the issue also mentions that Paul's wife is named Carol, that he is a doctor, and that he voted against recognizing MLK day as a national holiday. <BR/><BR/>Your proof fails because:<BR/>1) the name of Paul's wife, and the fact he's a doctor, are common knowledge; any writer would have known about them.<BR/>2) the only claim that is not public knowledge, but has to be checked - that Paul voted against recognizing MLK Day - is wrong. In fact, Paul's voted in favor of recognizing MLK Day. <BR/><BR/><BR/>http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/71/ <BR/><BR/>The fact that the author is wrong about this demolishes the case that the author is really Ron Paul. Even Jamie Kirchick, the author of the New Republic hit piece, has backed off that claim.George J. Dancehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17802922538748186834noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-12887878064504783482008-01-10T21:17:00.000-05:002008-01-10T21:17:00.000-05:00Sultan, I just posted a major article on all this ...Sultan, I just posted a major article on all this from my perspective of 12 years working for Paul at www.libertarianrepublican.blogspot.com<BR/><BR/>It echoes your sentiments, but zeros in on a very specific comment of Paul's that hits close to home, literally.Eric Donderohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02763399145451696076noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-69081571952211041032008-01-10T15:28:00.000-05:002008-01-10T15:28:00.000-05:00yes, he's quite clearly lied about authorship, tha...yes, he's quite clearly lied about authorship, that's a grave charge<BR/><BR/>as for Digg the ron paul fanatics took it over under multiple accounts so it's a waste of time mainly but stories like this frustrate themDaniel Greenfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13575285186581875356noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-2258121859277560182008-01-10T15:18:00.000-05:002008-01-10T15:18:00.000-05:00thanks, andrew walden has been doing a great job k...thanks, andrew walden has been doing a great job keeping tabs on paulDaniel Greenfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13575285186581875356noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-59479837867278015812008-01-10T15:17:00.000-05:002008-01-10T15:17:00.000-05:00Good point Rebecca. If he were truly sorry he woul...Good point Rebecca. If he were truly sorry he would have said so publicly from the get go. As it is, the more and more he speaks the deeper the hole he is digging himself into.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Ron Paul is pro-slavery no matter how he tries to rationalize it; consorts with neo-Nazis and Muslims and worse accepts money from them. In my book that makes him a racist.<BR/><BR/>BTW I read more of the comments on Digg from RP's defenders (little toadies like Renfield in Dracula no doubt. 'Master! Master'!).<BR/><BR/>Seriously though, if they can't see that a statement written in first person by a man who is congress, has a wife named carol and worked as flight surgeon wasn't written by Ron Paul they're insane and their loyalty and defense of him reeks of the kind of defense and militance you see among neo-Nazis.<BR/><BR/>And again, the AMA should yank his medical license. Someone with these racial biases isn't fit to give medical care to all patients regardless of race or religion.<BR/><BR/>Long comment, but I had trouble registering on Digg so I decided to write it here.Keli Atahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05089132216830000713noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-83903509143350747672008-01-10T15:03:00.000-05:002008-01-10T15:03:00.000-05:00yochanan of lgfhttp://www.americanthinker.com/2007...yochanan of lgf<BR/><BR/>http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/the_ron_paul_campaign_and_its.html<BR/><BR/>also an interesting read with lots of links to the facts in question<BR/><BR/>with thanks to the blues brothers<BR/>I HATE RON PAUL NAZISAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-38975255947727691522008-01-10T14:55:00.000-05:002008-01-10T14:55:00.000-05:00ron paul has tried to argue that he's based all hi...ron paul has tried to argue that he's based all his votes on principle, that he thinks black people are just great but he was voting on principle against what was unconstitutional<BR/><BR/>and that's the real problem with paul, he hides all of his views behind the constitution and these newsletters give us a peek at his real motives and beliefs and accordingly his present day dishonesty in sanitizing themDaniel Greenfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13575285186581875356noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-40445884969179492032008-01-10T14:49:00.001-05:002008-01-10T14:49:00.001-05:00How do these facts weigh against Knish's allegatio...How do these facts weigh against Knish's allegations - they add up to Ron Paul trying to cover up his past racist statements without coming out honestly and saying "I was wrong then." For me, that casts a lot of doubt on whether he is telling the truth now about what he feels about MLK. He certainly did vote against making King's birthday a national holiday - that's on the record.Rebeccahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17626228106192215280noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-89664062752324172682008-01-10T14:49:00.000-05:002008-01-10T14:49:00.000-05:00like most politicians, there's a gap between ron p...like most politicians, there's a gap between ron paul's public and private statements<BR/><BR/>out of congress and in these newsletters, he was clearly more willing to speak out on his beliefs than he was on the house floor and that's only natural<BR/><BR/>most politicians only really begin telling you what they think, once they get out of public office... take Jimmy Carter for example<BR/><BR/>the Rosa Parks medal was grandstanding, just like Paul voting against his own earmarks. It would have been a credible gesture only if he seriously believed it would come to that. Instead he used it to make a point about his fellow congressman, a point he knew he'd never have to follow through on<BR/><BR/>talking about "considering" Walter Williams doesn't actually mean anything. Besides paleocons like Buchanan have made alliances with people they find morally repulsive, such as Justin Raimondo. Taki funds half the paleocon movement and he's a convicted cokehead. Buchanan allied with Fulani to get the Reform party<BR/><BR/>finally presidents and vp's rarely get along, this administration excepted. Clinton and Gore or Reagan and Bush basically hated each other. You pick a VP for political advantage, so a choice of VP means very littleDaniel Greenfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13575285186581875356noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-18250806564872358042008-01-10T14:42:00.000-05:002008-01-10T14:42:00.000-05:00Your article certainly raises awareness - even to ...Your article certainly raises awareness - even to a Ron Paul leaning voter. However, what do you say about his infinitely held public position that MLK was a hero? What about his willingness to contribute his OWN money to honor Rosa Parks as opposed to using bankrupt federal funds? What about his decision to consider Walter Williams previously as his runningmate? Mr. Williams is a black man and apparently, respected and admired by Ron Paul. How do these FACTS also weigh against your strong allegations? Would you be willing to consider those in your article as well?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-80309291565205878562008-01-10T14:06:00.000-05:002008-01-10T14:06:00.000-05:00yes i suppose it's only a matter of time until i m...yes i suppose it's only a matter of time until i make their enemies list and they start hurling fake gold coins with ron paul's head on them through my windowDaniel Greenfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13575285186581875356noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-29092819767172909392008-01-10T13:54:00.000-05:002008-01-10T13:54:00.000-05:00Good Post, O Sultan of Truth! Beware, though; it ...Good Post, O Sultan of Truth! Beware, though; it appears you've already attracted folks from the Luap Nor Wingnut Party. <BR/><BR/>" Anonymous said... <BR/>Streeeetch, lets try to discredit Ron Paul, Streeeetch. Dig into his past, find nothing so you streeeetch.<BR/><BR/>Good Luck!<BR/><BR/>7:20 PM"<BR/><BR/>But, then again, they've been let out of the basement by Mommy for the day, and they forgot to take their meds. The rEVOLution fatwa against the unfortunate Sultan Knish begins in 5...4...3...2...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-66957256209429622782008-01-09T01:31:00.000-05:002008-01-09T01:31:00.000-05:00BTW, what is a trilateralist? Ron Paul keeps using...BTW, what is a trilateralist? Ron Paul keeps using the word in his newsletter.<BR/><BR/>As for his lying about MLK, he has to. He can't say the real reason he hates MLK and you can bet it has nothing to do with MLK's extramarital affairs.Keli Atahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05089132216830000713noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-19551627802288492752008-01-08T23:38:00.000-05:002008-01-08T23:38:00.000-05:00Not a matter of MLK or the rest of what he said be...Not a matter of MLK or the rest of what he said being true/untrue, its about him covering up how he really feels.<BR/>If he does feel this way, why not say so and be honest about it in public?Chana @ Lemon Lime Moonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11656854855385193867noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-71475447905138634662008-01-08T19:20:00.000-05:002008-01-08T19:20:00.000-05:00Streeeetch, lets try to discredit Ron Paul, Stree...Streeeetch, lets try to discredit Ron Paul, Streeeetch. Dig into his past, find nothing so you streeeetch.<BR/><BR/>Good Luck!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-36212676252110630332008-01-08T18:43:00.000-05:002008-01-08T18:43:00.000-05:00at the very least it proves ron paul lied about hi...at the very least it proves ron paul lied about his love for MLK and not being the author of the newslettersDaniel Greenfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13575285186581875356noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-42942696499954572022008-01-08T18:31:00.000-05:002008-01-08T18:31:00.000-05:00But then again, a lot the dirt on MLK is really di...But then again, a lot the dirt on MLK is really dirty! Do people have to love MLK to prove they aren't racist? I think you are being unfair to Dr. Paul.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com