tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post7750375661018315279..comments2024-03-29T00:24:13.128-04:00Comments on Daniel Greenfield / Sultan Knish Articles at DanielGreenfield.org : It All Comes Down to How Liberal You AreDaniel Greenfieldhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13575285186581875356noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-10245811468793238712016-02-21T10:29:43.784-05:002016-02-21T10:29:43.784-05:00The LIE-beral news media earning their pinnochios ...The LIE-beral news media earning their pinnochios one day at a time the talking heads and the printed news rags just leftists propegandistsSpurwing Plovernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-45664845620080159692010-11-06T08:50:07.326-04:002010-11-06T08:50:07.326-04:00SK, I share with you this site of Arun Shourie. ht...SK, I share with you this site of Arun Shourie. http://arunshourie.voiceofdharma.com/articles.htm<br />See what fake secularism has wrought in India. The Indian left are not liberals in the sense of caring for human rights, social justice and truth in history but totalitarian communists/socialists who align with totalitarian Islamists in India and pass off their anti-Hindu hatred as secularism and liberalism. Hindus speaking up against anti-Hindu hatred are depicted as fascists. The only good Hindu is the one who is silent and doesn't say anything against their bias. Pointing out their pervasive anti-Hindu bias in academics, politics, news media, makes Hindus to be "fascists." Basically a fascist is someone who isn't going along with the totalitarian communist/socialist/islamist narrative.<br /><br />How strange. The left around the world say they align with Native Americans and other aboriginals who suffered, but the natives of India, Hindus, who suffered violent imperialism by Muslims and others and were slaughtered in the tens of millions are seen and the villains when they are trying to undo the damage done over the centuries to them and the country and the Muslims are the forever victims.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-9543467088068405132010-10-11T15:56:52.773-04:002010-10-11T15:56:52.773-04:00Brilliant. I'm sure you could explain the rol...Brilliant. I'm sure you could explain the roles of the sun and the moon in terms of liberal bias.<br /><br />You're right about the Muslims, though, I'll give you that.<br /><br />-HaSmolaniAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-25622435563967870002010-10-11T07:39:55.865-04:002010-10-11T07:39:55.865-04:00To Juanita: I hope you won't be offended if I ...To Juanita: I hope you won't be offended if I correct your grammar. To say "a great writer such as yourself” is bad English. Yourself is a reflexive pronoun and should only be used to refer back to you as your subject. For example you would say, “You went to the store by yourself.” Your sentence would more appropriately be written, “… a great writer like you.” <br /> <br />DebraAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-15214837931474541762010-10-10T18:23:45.344-04:002010-10-10T18:23:45.344-04:00I sometimes think people are rarely concerned abou...I sometimes think people are rarely concerned about things that don't effect them personally and usually only speak out when it can be useful.Chana @ Lemon Lime Moonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11656854855385193867noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-74974880657984041692010-10-10T12:09:43.226-04:002010-10-10T12:09:43.226-04:00People like Klein end up hiring those who reflect ...People like Klein end up hiring those who reflect their own distaste for Jews and sympathy for Islamists. Their key defining idea is liberal, not Jewish. That they have some lingering Jewish identity only inspires resentment against Jews, their own and that of other liberals.Daniel Greenfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13575285186581875356noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-51679528822744882462010-10-10T11:45:17.338-04:002010-10-10T11:45:17.338-04:00What is ironic about Sanchez's comments is tha...What is ironic about Sanchez's comments is that it was the former head of CNN, a Jewish man named Klein, who was responsible for giving Sanchez the many opportunities he had at CNN.<br /><br />Sanchez won the Miami New Times award for Least Credible Journalist so many times that the paper eventually named the award after him. He was a joke in his own market and he had on his record a driving under the influence incident in which the man he hit ultimately died and in which Sanchez's only concern seemed to be how the fallout might impact his career.<br /><br />I would think that with Klein recently fired, the new regime at CNN already had their sights set on diminishing Sanchez's role or firing him. They surely viewed him as an embarrassment who delivered neither ratings nor credibility to their network. His comments regarding Stewart and the Jews provided an excuse for CNN executives to rid themselves of the albatross without having to fire an incompetent "minority" "journalist" for doing his job poorly.<br /><br />What is also ironic about this story is how Klein, who in this regard was typical of so many other powerful Jews in the media, did nothing whatsoever to advance the interests of his people, and in fact, ran a network that was blatantly biased against Jewish interests. That, of course, didn't spare him nor the rest of those "like him" (as Sanchez would say) from dealing with the venom typically aimed at Jews.<br /><br />During Kleins' tenure at CNN, Hezbollah fan Octavia Nasr was the Middle East editor; Islamist apologist Fareed Zakaria was given his own national and international show; the network promoted a God's Holy Warrior series in which the threat from Islam was downplayed and the "extremism" among Jews and other religious communities greatly exaggerated; Islamic Republic of Iran propagandists and professional Israel bashers Reza Aslan and Fawaz Gerges were brought on as commentators to explain the Middle East for us (the answer to every problem was "Israeli occupation") and Larry King was allowed to give the genocidal dictator Ahmadinejad the same mindless softball questions he gives C-list celebrities. And CNN international outlets continued to take an even harsher tone against the Jewish state in order to keep their access to Muslim markets.<br /><br />If the Jews run the media, and are to blame for anything regarding Sanchez's career, it's for keeping this moron on the air and then giving him bigger and more high-profile roles until he was so far beyond his capabilities that his lack of intelligence, gargantuan ego and boorish personality were prominently exposed for all to see and poke fun at. Yeah right, Rick, the Jews held you back!4infidelsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-50471067059251013952010-10-10T03:26:50.581-04:002010-10-10T03:26:50.581-04:00Liberal 'uber' elites cannot allow policy ...Liberal 'uber' elites cannot allow policy to be defined by 'unterliberals' and must always preserve the hierarchy. <br /><br /> This is the politico-religious norm, If policy is ONLY defined from the top only then it is easy to deal with 'bickering bigots' in the rank and file.<br /><br />The liberal rank and file are not there to think, but to provide the noise neccessary to make their 'betters' look and sound good.<br /><br />However, useful idiots need to be kept discipined, usually by the occasional public execution.<br /><br />This is just the modern form of 20th century liberal eugenicsMikecnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-3453933895940139542010-10-10T02:10:37.492-04:002010-10-10T02:10:37.492-04:00shavua tovshavua tovDaniel Greenfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13575285186581875356noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-42206151385488809632010-10-10T01:43:30.794-04:002010-10-10T01:43:30.794-04:00Considering the length and complexity of your dail...Considering the length and complexity of your daily articles it's understandable. No worries.<br /><br />Sanchez should have been reprimanded for sure. His comments were out of line. Though you're right. It did strike me as odd that CNN would find his remarks objectionable at all. This is the same CNN afterall that aired that disgusting documentary about Israeli settlers a while back.<br /><br />I agree. Sanchez was fired for his remarks about someone more liberal than he is.<br /><br /><br />Shavua tov:)Keli Atahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05089132216830000713noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-48464214468632962362010-10-10T00:17:16.618-04:002010-10-10T00:17:16.618-04:00yes you're correct of course, that's what ...yes you're correct of course, that's what comes of being under a time crunch and writing articles first draft<br /><br />thanksDaniel Greenfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13575285186581875356noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-13113885822188023012010-10-10T00:07:24.616-04:002010-10-10T00:07:24.616-04:00Sultan, you don't have to publish this comment...Sultan, you don't have to publish this comment but <i> "Sanchez was fired because he attacked a celebrity who is more liberal and more popular than him."</i> is bad English and an unforgivable sin in a great writer such as yourself, lol. It should be "than <b>he</b>" (is)!Juanitanoreply@blogger.com