tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post384266004017155214..comments2024-03-29T00:24:13.128-04:00Comments on Daniel Greenfield / Sultan Knish Articles at DanielGreenfield.org : Will Hillary Accept Defeat?Daniel Greenfieldhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13575285186581875356noreply@blogger.comBlogger18125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-55793807167395254552016-10-27T14:54:56.458-04:002016-10-27T14:54:56.458-04:00Trump promised to put blue states New York and Cal...Trump promised to put blue states New York and California in to play during the election. What we got was him putting RED STATES Texas, Utah and ARIZONA in to play for the Democrats.<br /><br /><br /><br />Vote Constitution party 2016DD Maonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-65144104689153801152016-10-27T00:48:03.584-04:002016-10-27T00:48:03.584-04:00"...what happens if the election is contested..."...what happens if the election is contested and goes to the Supreme Court again and the vote is 4-4? "<br /><br />Then, the decision of the lower court stands. What lower court that is depends on where the challenge is made.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-87694353033690982012016-10-27T00:32:33.797-04:002016-10-27T00:32:33.797-04:00The legitimacy of the Feds including the Supreme C...The legitimacy of the Feds including the Supreme Council of Elders could be thrown into turmoil by the first governor who emphatically says no. Open defiance on the state level is desperately needed.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03688647747392318324noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-26354904562728050132016-10-26T13:32:51.400-04:002016-10-26T13:32:51.400-04:00What is actually frightening to consider is what h...What is actually frightening to consider is what happens if the election is contested and goes to the Supreme Court again and the vote is 4-4? <br /><br />What then?Ignatius Acton Chesterton OCDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18222603717128565302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-67000539995495653122016-10-26T13:30:07.908-04:002016-10-26T13:30:07.908-04:00If Trump had "accepted the outcome" of t...If Trump had "accepted the outcome" of the election in advance, it would have initiated the largest, most blatant campaign of voter fraud in history. There would be no reason for the Democrats to hold back, since Trump conceded by giving his word.<br /><br />We are going to have a number of contested elections in the next 20 years. There are two main reasons for this, related to institutional power: <br /><br />(1) The Federal government is enormous, and consumes ever-greater quantities of the nation's resources, well beyond its tax receipts. This funds dependence and graft on a large scale, and strongly favors the candidate who won't shut off the spigot.<br /><br />(2) The Supreme Court is now a fully political, weaponized, co-equal branch of government that operates as a (supposedly) learned oligarchy to make sure the federal, state, county and municipal governments do what they -- the 9 unelected, lifetime-tenured robed oligarchs -- say. It is an institution with enormous unchecked power, save the near-impossible Amendment process. The court's current application of judicial review is unrestrained, completely beyond the bounds of the Founding Fathers' vision. It is so far outside the scope of Article III that it is unrecognizable when compared to the text... which is what lawyers and judges are supposed to be expert at. The Justices hold themselves as oracles, telling us what we should, ought, must believe instead of ruling on matters of law. The president nominates replacement justices, which is an awesome degree of power. The Senate has taken a stronger stance on approval, which is the only check in place. When you really think about it, the Supreme Court can do whatever it wants. And it does... totally out of scope, unaccountable and without boundaries.<br /><br />The tenor, collegiality and collaborative nature of American politics collapsed with the Robert Bork nomination. The Supreme Court is everything to Democrats, because it is the most reliable means to further their agenda, and the single most powerful institution they can control. It is un-democratic and un-republican.<br /><br />This is why there is so much money, power and vitriol. There's too much at stake. Hillary doesn't think of the good of the nation. Hillary acts on what's best for Hillary. Think about what a constitutionally-limited federal republic (which is what the USA is) with a federal government limited to clear, enumerated powers means for the Democrat Party: oblivion.Ignatius Acton Chesterton OCDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18222603717128565302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-4571787180989799722016-10-26T09:16:20.523-04:002016-10-26T09:16:20.523-04:00I wouldn't be so sure that an organization tha...I wouldn't be so sure that an organization that had broken and bought the FBI and the DoJ, has threatened or cajoled the media or bought it off, has hired thugs to attack people in public...and proudly admits it, that gets caught lying about lying about lying about everything......<br /><br />Is going to leave the actual outcome of this 20 year project up to 'voters', or 'people', or the democratic process, however flawed, at all. It's not by accident her media crows she's winning by 7, 8, 12, 20, 25 pts ever higher day by day. It's not to drive people away from voting, it's the lie they will tell ON election day. What they're doing is simply looking for the outer limits of what they think sounds plausible. All dictatorships do this. Saddam Hussein routinely 'won' elections with 99% of the vote. Ditto Enver Hoxha, and Ceaucescu. The votes on election probably won't count very much at all. And if we still have even a small functioning media that points out the lie, the Big Media will give it 10 or 15 seconds of airtime, laugh and move on calling it sour grapes. Reality is the perception of reality. If facebook, google and twitter twist your information to whatever they like, that's your reality. If CNN announces that Hillary 'won' with 70% of the popular vote and the next day the NY Times reports that its eagle eyed reporters confirm it, who's going to argue? Empress Trudyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06073538968722986065noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-406546482100374732016-10-26T05:42:23.128-04:002016-10-26T05:42:23.128-04:00Shillariah C-l-i-n-t-0-0-n and the Democracktic pa...Shillariah C-l-i-n-t-0-0-n and the Democracktic party's response to a Trump win:<br />It's impossible. We made sure there more voters for Hilarious Rotten Crotch before the election even started. Every cat, dog and graveyard in America voted for Hilarious.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-61328853766919723622016-10-25T15:40:16.725-04:002016-10-25T15:40:16.725-04:00As soon as Mr. Trump takes office ISIS fighters wi...As soon as Mr. Trump takes office ISIS fighters will take a cheap flight back to the kebab business somewhere in Europe, the Iranian Ayatollahs will feel more inclined to allow nuclear inspectors and at home apart from the freakiest leftists the rest won’t risk tenure for ‘the cause’… even Soros will shift his investments from BLM to NASDAQ, a much better future is coming to the land of the free.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-23923170472836531402016-10-24T19:51:07.810-04:002016-10-24T19:51:07.810-04:00Will whatever the outcome of the election happens ...Will whatever the outcome of the election happens to be, be used as an excuse to declare martial law?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-62361492200823001702016-10-24T18:10:51.245-04:002016-10-24T18:10:51.245-04:00Steven DenBeste died recently. He was a lighthouse...Steven DenBeste died recently. He was a lighthouse. You are the new DenBeste. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-53197323397472881862016-10-24T16:58:52.170-04:002016-10-24T16:58:52.170-04:00She will lose by a landslide. Her crooked ways won...She will lose by a landslide. Her crooked ways won't work this time. Clintons need to be in jail. End of story.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09518677967627217789noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-74814371102299251952016-10-24T13:18:23.186-04:002016-10-24T13:18:23.186-04:00Democrats know that winning justifies all means. ...Democrats know that winning justifies all means. With media cover, many voters don't even see a problem. Sadly, the sportsmanlike Republicans and principle paralysed Libertarians are left wondering where the last sucker punch came from.<br /><br />Since Reagan, so many disgraceful fiats have been foisted on loyal Americans by leftists and rinos with glib media cachet. Even if these Loyals aren't heard over the din of the elite, Donald J. Trump presents them a clear vision of the America to regain.<br /><br />May they vote in overwhelming numbers; a mandate for the Renaissance of our Founder inspired and beloved Republic.<br /><br />ABSJ1136<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-44733431218042693722016-10-24T12:14:25.591-04:002016-10-24T12:14:25.591-04:00Today, Obama ridicules Trump for saying the same t...Today, Obama ridicules Trump for saying the same thing he has said; but when Obama said it, everyone nods their heads approvingly and the media laps it up like the dogs that they are. Here is Obama in 2008 saying basically the exact same thing that Trump now says.<br /><br /><br />http://www.mrctv.org/blog/obama-speaks-rigged-elections-2008 <br /><br />And now Obama wants to "curate" your news:<br /><br />http://www.fitsnews.com/2016/10/14/barack-obama-wants-to-curate-your-news-feed/<br /><br />“Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? - Who will watch the watchers?” Juvenal, The Sixteen Satire<br /><br />We currently have government officials taking the 5th Amendment; the corruption of the media, which is owned and operated by large multinational corporations and foreign investors; the gutting of the military; the instigation of mobs (by elected officials and clerks working for the government)--and all this is a product of corruption from the White House down. I have never seen such scoundrels running our highest levels of government like we have today. We find ourselves in this dilemma because a fish rots from the head down. When you have a rotten leadership, they hire and surround themselves with the most corrupt crooks who fiddle while Rome burns. Our government no longer cares about its citizenry; rather, they are selling us out for the one thing they cherish most--namely, power and the retention of power.<br /><br />"Freedom is the right to tell people what they don't want to hear." George Orwell<br /><br />"In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act." George Orwell<br /><br />King Western ManAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-15825481926869814292016-10-24T10:43:17.394-04:002016-10-24T10:43:17.394-04:00Excellent article. Thank you for summarising the d...Excellent article. Thank you for summarising the dubious actions of the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton in particular. They truly are the deplorables.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-17592094506805107922016-10-24T07:30:55.831-04:002016-10-24T07:30:55.831-04:00Even more to the point is Gore's revolutionary...Even more to the point is Gore's revolutionary appeal to the General Will - that mere arithmetical tabulation of votes does not suffice to establish a legitimate result, what matters is what Demos WOULD have done, if the ballots were not confusing, or if Demos was not suffering from false consciousness.<br /><br />This radical argument was pursued to its conclusion when Thomas Frank re-issued Lenin's "What Is To Be Done" under the title "What's the Matter With Kansas" in 2004, pointing out that since the working class, besotted by false consciousness, does not know its own best interest, that wiser heads have the right to form a revolutionary vanguard and to seize power by whatever means necessary and to rule in their stead.<br /><br />Hillary is using propaganda, intimidation, and slander to achieve power, but building on the Gore-Thomas Frank argument as a foundation, who can doubt that she would go all the way if necessary?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-1227741069580026912016-10-24T07:13:43.608-04:002016-10-24T07:13:43.608-04:00Good point. MSM is obsessing over the case where H...Good point. MSM is obsessing over the case where H wins and T challenges. But none of them are discussing the possibility that T wins and H challenges.Infidelnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-61178943937188751902016-10-24T05:06:27.410-04:002016-10-24T05:06:27.410-04:00Hillary could lose in a clear landslide and still ...Hillary could lose in a clear landslide and still not concede. This is her last hurrah and she knows it. Slide would be an ignominious failure she is not psychologically capable of excepting. I think she would rather melt down into a puddle of toxic waste so corrosive it would consume Bill and Chelsea and all around her. Cackling to the very end about how the entire world cheated her out of his Devine right to coronation.JWMJRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11330556524852443926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11368628.post-40591920527003872552016-10-23T22:12:27.783-04:002016-10-23T22:12:27.783-04:00It is astounding that liberals every where are con...It is astounding that liberals every where are contending that conservatives are brain-dead. It is obvious, liberals are deranged and brain-dead. That makes them zombies!Hummingbirdhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04137522222891501098noreply@blogger.com